[Koha-devel] Signing-off a patch for a customer

[Chris Nighswonger]

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain at biblibre.com>wrote:

> Le 28/05/2012 17:46, Jared Camins-Esakov a écrit :
> > Paul, et. al.,
> >
> > Sorry about the second e-mail ten seconds after the first.
> >
> >     (I don't want to count bug 6858 in this list, because, for me, it has
> >     been tested by a dis-interested -well, in fact, calling the library
> >     "dis-interested" is maybe not the best term, but nevermind ;-) )
> >
> >
> > I don't see how the library that commissioned the development could be
> > disinterested.
> me too, but the term "dis-interested" was used by chris_n, so I used it
> too. But I agree everybody involved in a patch has an interest to see it
> pushed ;-)
>
>
By "disinterested" I specifically mean one who has no pecunary (cash)
interest in seeing the patch pushed. This exlcue both ends of the
transaction: the party paying and the party being paid. All others would be
truly disinterested parties.


> >     I don't want to break the rule. I just request that 3 identified ppl
> >     from BibLibre can sign-off in the name of the customer (I like the
> Proxy
> >     term).
> > In case this wasn't clear, I have absolutely no objection to this,
> > provided the customer sticks a note on the bug so the history is clear.
> I think you missed something: don't expect a *french* librarian to
> create an account on bugzilla that is in this strange language called
> *english* !
> Some of them will do, but that's only a small part.
>
>
Have them use *french* then... or whatever language they are comfortable
in. There are enough resources to handle translation around here I think.

Does BZ have a multi-lingual interface?

Kind Regards,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20120528/43bd5266/attachment.htm>