[Koha-devel] [QA] QAing and signing off
Paul Poulain
paul.poulain at biblibre.com
Mon Nov 26 09:53:34 CET 2012
Le 26/11/2012 09:20, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
> Jared,
> The additional signoff will mean more workload for the QA team, since it
> requires additional testing. Which is fine of course in theory, but may
> lead to a larger queue of patches waiting for QA, etc.
I agree that it's something we should do, and I already started on a few
patches I QAed before the 3.10, even if they were patches for 3.12
With git-bz, it just takes a few seconds, not a big deal. I just want to
add/suggest that this requirement is not applied for string patches that
are obviously OK and don't need to be tested. (that remind me I must do
some changes to bugzilla , to add "ENH: New feature", and patch
complexity field. Will do that now ;-) )
--
Paul POULAIN - BibLibre
http://www.biblibre.com
Free & Open Source Softwares for libraries
Koha, Drupal, Piwik, Jasper
More information about the Koha-devel
mailing list