[Koha-devel] Koha.next: Consolidate OPAC themes?

[Paul]

At 11:20 AM 4/11/2013 -0400, Kyle Hall wrote:
>I think the biggest issue with just ditching the prog opac theme is 
>everyone who upgrades will lose their customizations, and have to re-do 
>them. However, if the prog theme has a specific sunset release, it will 
>give everyone time to re-customize and hopefully patch the theme for any 
>customizations that currently work on prog but not on ccsr due to lack of 
>id's or classes.

Is it a good guess that just about every library (including CSSR) has their 
*own* customization of the OPAC interface? And that they all started with 
"prog"? If so, why ditch the common denominator?

Not having 3.10 installed here, is there a "write up" on what the 
differences are? I've tried searching for 'cssr' on the bugs page but can 
only find snippets, and elsewhere have found:

<jcamins at cpbibliography.com> wrote:
 >> > Administration > System Preferences > OPAC > opacthemes > ccsr
 >> Is ccsr supposed to be default in 3.10?
 > No. The default remains prog. ccsr is an alternative for those who want it.

Plus some references to mobile apps.  I had a look at 
https://sherbrooke.koha.ccsr.qc.ca/ but obviously that doesn't show what 
the underlying changes are.

So I'm looking for pointers, please?

tnx and br - Paul



>http://www.kylehall.info
>ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com )
>Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org )
>Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org )
>Mill Run Technology Solutions ( http://millruntech.com )
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Owen Leonard <oleonard at myacpl.org> wrote:
>Is there anyone who disagrees that we should merge the two themes and
>have only one in the future?
>
>Is the CCSR theme design the one every one likes better?
>
>If not, what features of each should be preferred?
>
>   -- Owen
>
>--
>Web Developer
>Athens County Public Libraries
>http://www.myacpl.org