From liz at catalyst.net.nz Fri May 1 00:15:43 2015 From: liz at catalyst.net.nz (Liz Rea) Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 10:15:43 +1200 Subject: [Koha-devel] "News" area is gone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5542A98F.9060900@catalyst.net.nz> Hi Luciana This issue is caused by a bug in Koha: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12507 The good news is, it only happens on the last day of the month, and the news will be back tomorrow. In other good news, the fix for it has already been pushed into Koha upstream, so this problem won't occur once you upgrade to an unaffected version (3.16.10, 3.18+). If you need the contents of the news before tomorrow, you can look at the news items directly in More -> Tools -> News -> then select the news item. Cheers, Liz On 01/05/15 01:36, Luciana Coca wrote: > Hello everyone! > The "News" area have dissappeared. > The configuration and preferences are correct. I have deleted and > created new News, but nothing happend. > Please, help me. > > Thank you all. > Luciana. > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- -- Liz Rea Catalyst.Net Limited Level 6, Catalyst House, 150 Willis Street, Wellington. P.O Box 11053, Manners Street, Wellington 6142 GPG: B149 A443 6B01 7386 C2C7 F481 B6c2 A49D 3726 38B7 From robin at catalyst.net.nz Fri May 1 01:02:56 2015 From: robin at catalyst.net.nz (Robin Sheat) Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 11:02:56 +1200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Problems with Indexdata idzebra-2.0 build (Zebra 2.0.59) In-Reply-To: References: <55420A74.40508@abunchofthings.net> Message-ID: <1430434976.15471.68.camel@catalyst.net.nz> Tomas Cohen Arazi schreef op do 30-04-2015 om 10:23 [-0300]: > It seems (from jenkins output) that search is broken on GRS-1 setups > on Jessie. > Which we don't really care as we dropped support for GRS-1 on 3.18. There is something else wrong with the jessie version, too. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777515 -- Robin Sheat Catalyst IT Ltd. ? +64 4 803 2204 GPG: 5FA7 4B49 1E4D CAA4 4C38 8505 77F5 B724 F871 3BDF -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bgkriegel at gmail.com Fri May 1 16:15:20 2015 From: bgkriegel at gmail.com (Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel) Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 11:15:20 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Jenkins & the Manual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It's strange, I have no problems with the repo, but Jenkins seems to have. Fetching upstream changes from git://git.koha-community.org/kohadocs.git > git --version # timeout=10 > git -c core.askpass=true fetch --tags --progress git://git.koha-community.org/kohadocs.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* ERROR: Timeout after 10 minutesERROR : Error cloning remote repo 'origin'ERROR : Error cloning remote repo 'origin' -- Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel bgkriegel at gmail.com On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Nicole Engard wrote: > Hi all, > > I don't know who manages this so I'm sorry to email everyone, but the > manual on Jenkins is a big screwy. > > http://jenkins.koha-community.org/ > > The 3.18 branch is missing and the master branch fails all the time > but it generates the HTML and PDFs a-ok and shows no errors when I > validate in Oxygen. Eventually the failures stop and it passes - so I > know nothing is wrong with the manual itself, I wonder if something is > screwy with the fact that the wrong branches are being checked. > > Nicole > _______________________________________________ > Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org > Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz > https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtompset at hotmail.com Sat May 2 03:57:01 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 21:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] prove xt results Message-ID: Greetings, mtompset at debian:~/kohaclone$ prove xt xt/permissions.t ............ ok xt/sample_notices.t ......... 1/? # Failed test 'No sample notice to add' # at xt/sample_notices.t line 82. # Sample notices to add in de-DE/mandatory/sample_notices.sql: DISCHARGE # Looks like you failed 1 test of 34. xt/sample_notices.t ......... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/34 subtests xt/single_quotes.t .......... ok xt/tt_valid.t ............... ok xt/verify-debian-docbook.t .. ok xt/yaml_valid.t ............. ok Test Summary Report ------------------- xt/sample_notices.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 34 Failed: 1) Failed test: 9 Non-zero exit status: 1 Files=6, Tests=117, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 2.73 cusr 0.00 csys = 2.77 CPU) Result: FAIL Given that I don?t know what to add (in terms of language), I thought I?d mention it here so that some loving developer familiar with de-DE might remedy the situation. GPML, Mark Tompsett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bgkriegel at gmail.com Sat May 2 04:48:34 2015 From: bgkriegel at gmail.com (Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel) Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 23:48:34 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] prove xt results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Good catch Mark! http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14119 Bernardo -- Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel bgkriegel at gmail.com On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Mark Tompsett wrote: > Greetings, > > mtompset at debian:~/kohaclone$ prove xt > xt/permissions.t ............ ok > xt/sample_notices.t ......... 1/? > # Failed test 'No sample notice to add' > # at xt/sample_notices.t line 82. > # Sample notices to add in de-DE/mandatory/sample_notices.sql: DISCHARGE > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 34. > xt/sample_notices.t ......... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > Failed 1/34 subtests > xt/single_quotes.t .......... ok > xt/tt_valid.t ............... ok > xt/verify-debian-docbook.t .. ok > xt/yaml_valid.t ............. ok > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > xt/sample_notices.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 34 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 9 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Files=6, Tests=117, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 2.73 cusr > 0.00 csys = 2.77 CPU) > Result: FAIL > > Given that I don?t know what to add (in terms of language), I thought I?d > mention it here so that some loving developer familiar with de-DE might > remedy the situation. > > GPML, > Mark Tompsett > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomascohen at gmail.com Mon May 4 04:38:50 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 23:38:50 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Jenkins & the Manual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Bernardo, the problem is the 10 minutes timeout the jenkins process has. The solution is to manually clone the first time and assign the right permissions. I'll take a look tomorrow, but I think we should make Galen a call as it is his node. Regards El 1/5/2015 11:15 a. m., "Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel" escribi?: > It's strange, I have no problems with the repo, > but Jenkins seems to have. > > Fetching upstream changes from git://git.koha-community.org/kohadocs.git > > git --version # timeout=10 > > git -c core.askpass=true fetch --tags --progress git://git.koha-community.org/kohadocs.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* > ERROR: Timeout after 10 minutesERROR : Error cloning remote repo 'origin'ERROR : Error cloning remote repo 'origin' > > > > -- > Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel > bgkriegel at gmail.com > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Nicole Engard wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I don't know who manages this so I'm sorry to email everyone, but the >> manual on Jenkins is a big screwy. >> >> http://jenkins.koha-community.org/ >> >> The 3.18 branch is missing and the master branch fails all the time >> but it generates the HTML and PDFs a-ok and shows no errors when I >> validate in Oxygen. Eventually the failures stop and it passes - so I >> know nothing is wrong with the manual itself, I wonder if something is >> screwy with the fact that the wrong branches are being checked. >> >> Nicole >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org >> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz >> https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dcook at prosentient.com.au Mon May 4 04:57:03 2015 From: dcook at prosentient.com.au (David Cook) Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 12:57:03 +1000 Subject: [Koha-devel] Problems with Indexdata idzebra-2.0 build (Zebra 2.0.59) In-Reply-To: <1430434976.15471.68.camel@catalyst.net.nz> References: <55420A74.40508@abunchofthings.net> <1430434976.15471.68.camel@catalyst.net.nz> Message-ID: <050501d08615$ffb21340$ff1639c0$@prosentient.com.au> As Robin points out, the 2.0.59 version of Zebra has another problem as well. When using ICU, words with hyphens aren't tokenized correctly. For instance, "Mont-Royal" would be truncated down to "Mont" both at indexing and search time. So a query for "Mont-Royal" would indeed return the records for "Mont-Royal", but it would also return the records for "Mont-Liban". A query for "Royal" would also return no records for "Mont-Royal" as well. Dreadful. However, IndexData have fixed this problem with Zebra 2.0.60. So... that's a thing. At the moment, the easiest most short-term fix to me is to point to IndexData's Debian repositories, but I don't think that'll be acceptable as a long-term solution. We mostly use OpenSuse, and I managed to get them to add Zebra 2.0.60 to their stable repositories, so we're OK for now. Now that Jessie has been released, perhaps there's a higher chance of the fix getting into Debian stable as well? David Cook Systems Librarian Prosentient Systems 72/330 Wattle St, Ultimo, NSW 2007 > -----Original Message----- > From: koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org [mailto:koha-devel- > bounces at lists.koha-community.org] On Behalf Of Robin Sheat > Sent: Friday, 1 May 2015 9:03 AM > To: koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Problems with Indexdata idzebra-2.0 build (Zebra > 2.0.59) > > Tomas Cohen Arazi schreef op do 30-04-2015 om 10:23 [-0300]: > > It seems (from jenkins output) that search is broken on GRS-1 setups > > on Jessie. > > Which we don't really care as we dropped support for GRS-1 on 3.18. > > There is something else wrong with the jessie version, too. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777515 > > -- > Robin Sheat > Catalyst IT Ltd. > ? +64 4 803 2204 > GPG: 5FA7 4B49 1E4D CAA4 4C38 8505 77F5 B724 F871 3BDF From indradg at gmail.com Mon May 4 16:13:18 2015 From: indradg at gmail.com (Indranil Das Gupta) Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:43:18 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] About "Free" as variabletype in Local use syspref definitions Message-ID: Hi, I needed to add a few Local Use sysprefs - SMSSendUsername / SMSSendPassword - both of which are of 'Free' variabl type0 (the default type if the Koha Internal fieldset options are not used) IMHO having the option 'Free' offered as well in the list might be a good idea. I've filed a bug and posted a trivial patch against systempreferences.tt at http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14135 Would like some feedback. If the general opinion is it is not required, I'll close it as 'RESOLVED WONTFIX' thanks -- Indranil Das Gupta Phone : +91-98300-20971 Blog : http://indradg.randomink.org/blog IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net Twitter : indradg -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please exchange editable Office documents only in ODF Format. No other format is acceptable. Support Open Standards. For a free editor supporting ODF, please visit LibreOffice - http://www.documentfoundation.org From mtompset at hotmail.com Tue May 5 01:15:59 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] Cleaner tests Message-ID: Greetings, Bugs 14110-14118,14120-14121 make ?prove t? less noisy. Feedback and sign offs appreciated. GPML, Mark Tompsett P.S. More test cleaning up coming, Tomas. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wlEmoticon-smile[1].png Type: image/png Size: 1046 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wlEmoticon-winkingsmile[1].png Type: image/png Size: 1135 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mirko at abunchofthings.net Tue May 5 12:17:03 2015 From: mirko at abunchofthings.net (Mirko Tietgen) Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 11:17:03 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] General IRC Meeting 06 May 2015 / Roles for 3.22 Message-ID: <5548989F.9030108@abunchofthings.net> Dear list, this is a quick reminder about the Koha Community General IRC Meeting in about 24 hours, 06 May 2015 10:00 UTC. Get your local time for the event at http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Koha+IRC+General+Meeting&iso=20150506T10 Among other things, we will decide on the team for the Koha 3.22 release. A list of roles and candidates can be found at http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Roles_for_3.22 You can find the full agenda of the meeting at http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_IRC_meeting_6_May_2015 -- Mirko -- Mirko Tietgen mirko at abunchofthings.net http://koha.abunchofthings.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From ISM at kis.in Tue May 5 12:37:30 2015 From: ISM at kis.in (KIS ISM) Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 10:37:30 +0000 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.18 and Ldap with Active Directory not working Message-ID: <980d71abc55d42c0b03d3ea494ead2ae@SerEx1.kis.in> Hi, I'm having such a hard time to get ldap with AD (on Windows Server 2012 R2) to work - now trying on 3.18.3 Koha login does see whether username/password is correct but exists with error on correct username/password. Yes, I changed and %s at kis.in to all the different variations I did find no the net. No success. Does anyone have any ideas? Rudy Wuthrich, Kodaikanal International School This is my ldap part from koha-config.xml 1 ldaps://serad1.kis.in OU=KISaaaa,OU=KISbbbb,DC=kis,DC=in CN=ldapuser,DC=kis,DC=in password 1 1 1 %s at kis.in
KIS
Here is what happens: When I try with wrong username/password ? You entered an incorrect With correct username/password Software error: LDAP search failed to return object : 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-03100238, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of: 'OU=KISStaff,DC=kis,DC=in' at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Auth_with_ldap.pm line 92. For help, please send mail to the webmaster ([no address given]), giving this error message and the time and date of the error. And from the opac-error.log [Tue May 05 15:57:37 2015] [error] [client 172.16.98.24] [Tue May 5 15:57:37 2015] opac-user.pl: LDAP search failed to return object : 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-03100238, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of:, referer: http://172.16.60.73:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl [Tue May 05 15:57:37 2015] [error] [client 172.16.98.24] [Tue May 5 15:57:37 2015] opac-user.pl: \t'OU=KISStaff,DC=kis,DC=in', referer: http://172.16.60.73:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl [Tue May 05 15:57:37 2015] [error] [client 172.16.98.24] [Tue May 5 15:57:37 2015] opac-user.pl: , referer: http://172.16.60.73:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From michael.hafen at washk12.org Tue May 5 18:31:16 2015 From: michael.hafen at washk12.org (Michael Hafen) Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 10:31:16 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.18 and Ldap with Active Directory not working In-Reply-To: <980d71abc55d42c0b03d3ea494ead2ae@SerEx1.kis.in> References: <980d71abc55d42c0b03d3ea494ead2ae@SerEx1.kis.in> Message-ID: Usually, in AD, the beginning of the principal name is the same as the sAMAccountName, have you tried that in the mapping for userid? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:37 AM, KIS ISM wrote: > Hi, > > > > I?m having such a hard time to get ldap with AD (on Windows Server 2012 > R2) to work ? now trying on 3.18.3 > > > > Koha login does see whether username/password is correct but exists with > error on correct username/password. > > > > Yes, I changed and %s at kis.in > to all the different variations I did find no the net. No success. > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > > > Rudy Wuthrich, Kodaikanal International School > > > > This is my ldap part from koha-config.xml > > > > 1 > > > > ldaps://serad1.kis.in > > OU=KISaaaa,OU=KISbbbb,DC=kis,DC=in > > CN=ldapuser,DC=kis,DC=in > > password > > 1 > > 1 > > 1 > > %s at kis.in > > > > > > > > > >
KIS
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > Here is what happens: > > > > When I try with wrong username/password > > ? You entered an incorrect > > > > With correct username/password > Software error: > > LDAP search failed to return object : 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-03100238, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of: > > 'OU=KISStaff,DC=kis,DC=in' > > at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Auth_with_ldap.pm line 92. > > For help, please send mail to the webmaster ([no address given]), giving > this error message and the time and date of the error. > > And from the opac-error.log > > [Tue May 05 15:57:37 2015] [error] [client 172.16.98.24] [Tue May 5 > 15:57:37 2015] opac-user.pl: LDAP search failed to return object : > 0000208D: NameErr: DSID-03100238, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best > match of:, referer: http://172.16.60.73:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl > > [Tue May 05 15:57:37 2015] [error] [client 172.16.98.24] [Tue May 5 > 15:57:37 2015] opac-user.pl: \t'OU=KISStaff,DC=kis,DC=in', referer: > http://172.16.60.73:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl > > [Tue May 05 15:57:37 2015] [error] [client 172.16.98.24] [Tue May 5 > 15:57:37 2015] opac-user.pl: , referer: > http://172.16.60.73:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Michael Hafen Washington County School District Technology Department Systems Analyst -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomascohen at gmail.com Wed May 6 17:54:39 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 12:54:39 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Jenkins emails / explanation Message-ID: We might have become used to not receiving Jenkins emails regarding regressions. So I decided to send this short explanation of what they are and what are the expected steps when you receive one. Jenkins sends emails to authors of patches that got pushed into the branch being tested, in the event of some tests starting to fail on that push. The expected behaviour from devs is to check the link provided, and browse to the 'Test results' section on the left (not sure the wording, mine is in spanish and didn't figure/look how to change it). There you'll see the failing tests. It is expected that you check if it is related to your patches, and in case it is, contact me or the release maintainer to talk about the problem introduced. This might yield to a followup on the bug, or a new bug. It will depend on the situation but I doesn't really matter. Right now some tests are failing randomly, and is consistent with us running the tests randomly too :-D (prove -s) It seems to mean that some of our tests do have side effects that change the scenario for the rest of the tests. Anyone interested in taking on this inter-test dependency please let me know. I don't have the time to do it right now, so close to the release. But fixing it (either the tests or the hidden bugs) would be great. It would make our tests and the product as a whole, just better. Kind regards -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtompset at hotmail.com Wed May 6 20:37:41 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 14:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] Jenkins emails / explanation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Greetings, http://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D8/39/console I know that this: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14103 will at least solve part of the floody emails. Sign off anyone? GPML, Mark Tompsett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kohanews at gmail.com Wed May 6 20:56:34 2015 From: kohanews at gmail.com (kohanews) Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 11:56:34 -0700 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha Community Newsletter: April 2015 Message-ID: <554A63E2.2000105@gmail.com> Fellow Koha users: The Koha Community Newsletter for April 2015 is here: http://koha-community.org/koha-community-newsletter-april-2015/ Many thanks to the folks who submitted articles and news to this month's newsletter. Please feel free to email me with any corrections or suggestions. Thanks! Chad Roseburg Editor, Koha Community Newsletter From nengard at gmail.com Thu May 7 01:33:38 2015 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 18:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Jenkins & the Manual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Galen, Any luck fixing this - now that emails are sending it's rather annoying to get these emails every time I submit a patch when things are working - it's making me ignore them all. Nicole On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote: > Bernardo, the problem is the 10 minutes timeout the jenkins process has. > The solution is to manually clone the first time and assign the right > permissions. > > I'll take a look tomorrow, but I think we should make Galen a call as it is > his node. > > Regards > > El 1/5/2015 11:15 a. m., "Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel" > escribi?: >> >> It's strange, I have no problems with the repo, >> but Jenkins seems to have. >> >> Fetching upstream changes from git://git.koha-community.org/kohadocs.git >> > git --version # timeout=10 >> > git -c core.askpass=true fetch --tags --progress >> git://git.koha-community.org/kohadocs.git >> +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* >> ERROR: Timeout after 10 minutes >> ERROR: Error cloning remote repo 'origin' >> ERROR: Error cloning remote repo 'origin' >> >> >> >> -- >> Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel >> bgkriegel at gmail.com >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Nicole Engard wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I don't know who manages this so I'm sorry to email everyone, but the >>> manual on Jenkins is a big screwy. >>> >>> http://jenkins.koha-community.org/ >>> >>> The 3.18 branch is missing and the master branch fails all the time >>> but it generates the HTML and PDFs a-ok and shows no errors when I >>> validate in Oxygen. Eventually the failures stop and it passes - so I >>> know nothing is wrong with the manual itself, I wonder if something is >>> screwy with the fact that the wrong branches are being checked. >>> >>> Nicole >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org >>> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz >>> https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ From bob at calyx.net.au Thu May 7 04:35:39 2015 From: bob at calyx.net.au (Bob Birchall) Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 12:35:39 +1000 Subject: [Koha-devel] Learning Tools Interoperability Message-ID: <554ACF7B.4010701@calyx.net.au> Hi, I've been asked if Koha has support for LTI and if not, is it in a road map? I guess they mean this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_Tools_Interoperability Its not something I have heard of before. Any thoughts? Thank you, Bob Birchall Calyx From mirko at abunchofthings.net Thu May 7 13:56:59 2015 From: mirko at abunchofthings.net (Mirko Tietgen) Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 12:56:59 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Learning Tools Interoperability In-Reply-To: <554ACF7B.4010701@calyx.net.au> References: <554ACF7B.4010701@calyx.net.au> Message-ID: <554B530B.5030900@abunchofthings.net> Hi Bob, Bob Birchall schrieb am 07.05.2015 > Hi, I've been asked if Koha has support for LTI and if not, is it > in a road map? I guess they mean this: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_Tools_Interoperability > > Its not something I have heard of before. Any thoughts? I came across this a while back when I started using BigBlueButton.[1] This is more like an overview of things I found than an opinion on LTI support in Koha. Basically there are hosts (called ?consumers?) and plugins (called ?tools?) that are supposed to allow easy interoperability. Hosts can be learning management systems like moodle[2] (often used by german universities), tools can be a lot of different things. I found a list here.[3] There seems to be only a small number of Free Software tools available (only searched the page for ?open?, did not check all corresponding websites). When I did my research, I was thinking of Koha as a host, so I could have BigBlueButton as a tool in Koha. It's also possible the person that asked you was thinking of Koha as a tool within a different host (have the OPAC or some administration within an LMS maybe?). The latter would probably only work on a per-Koha-module-level. I did not find the specs the last time and thought it was only available to members (and lost interest quickly). Seems like that is not true. I have not had a look at it but I have the link here so I'll add it.[4] This is the first version, others can be found in the overview page.[5] LTI certification for software seems to be bound to membership. Assuming Koha as a community project would be considered a non-profit organisation, that is $500 US per year.[6] If i'm not mistaken, it is possible to implement LTI without certification. -- Mirko [1] http://bigbluebutton.org/ [2] https://moodle.org [3] http://developers.imsglobal.org/catalog.html [4] http://www.imsglobal.org/lti/blti/bltiv1p0/ltiBLTIimgv1p0.html [5] http://www.imsglobal.org/lti/index.html [6] http://www.imsglobal.org/cc/jointhealliance.cfm -- Mirko Tietgen mirko at abunchofthings.net http://koha.abunchofthings.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From Giuseppe.Angilella at ct.infn.it Fri May 8 15:13:03 2015 From: Giuseppe.Angilella at ct.infn.it (Giuseppe Angilella) Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 15:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Koha-devel] staff member responsible of loan/renewal recorded in issues? Message-ID: Dear Kohaers, is the information concerning which staff member was responsible of a loan or renewal of a given item recorded anywhere in the database? I couldn't find it in the "issues" tables. Assuming it is not, it could be a relevant information to record, in cases where several staff members (or even all patrons) have issueing privileges. Many thanks, Giuseppe. From veron at veron.ch Fri May 8 16:34:29 2015 From: veron at veron.ch (=?windows-1252?Q?Marc_V=E9ron?=) Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 16:34:29 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] staff member responsible of loan/renewal recorded in issues? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <554CC975.8070109@veron.ch> Hi Giuseppe, Go to: Home > Tools > Log Viewer Select "Modules" > Circulation Regards, Marc From indradg at gmail.com Sat May 9 15:49:15 2015 From: indradg at gmail.com (Indranil Das Gupta) Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 19:19:15 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] I think I just messed up on signing 13673 Message-ID: first timer mess-ups http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13673#c6 how do I revert this? thanks! -- Indranil Das Gupta Phone : +91-98300-20971 Blog : http://indradg.randomink.org/blog IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net Twitter : indradg -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please exchange editable Office documents only in ODF Format. No other format is acceptable. Support Open Standards. For a free editor supporting ODF, please visit LibreOffice - http://www.documentfoundation.org From tomascohen at gmail.com Sat May 9 16:43:01 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 11:43:01 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] I think I just messed up on signing 13673 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On the details of the attachment, obsolete it. It is not big deal so no worries! El 9/5/2015 10:49 a. m., "Indranil Das Gupta" escribi?: > first timer mess-ups > > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13673#c6 > > how do I revert this? > > thanks! > > -- > Indranil Das Gupta > > Phone : +91-98300-20971 > Blog : http://indradg.randomink.org/blog > IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net > Twitter : indradg > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Please exchange editable Office documents only in ODF Format. No other > format is acceptable. Support Open Standards. > > For a free editor supporting ODF, please visit LibreOffice - > http://www.documentfoundation.org > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtompset at hotmail.com Sat May 9 23:18:59 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 17:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] I think I just messed up on signing 13673 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Greetings, All is back to a semblance of order. Patch 1 and 3 still need sign off. GPML, Mark Tompsett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wlEmoticon-smile[1].png Type: image/png Size: 1046 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pablo.bianchi at gmail.com Sun May 10 06:56:34 2015 From: pablo.bianchi at gmail.com (Pablo Bianchi) Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 01:56:34 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] SQL Reports Library v2.0 Message-ID: Hi, I count more than 300 reports on *SQL Reports Library*, is getting a little bit out of control. Become difficult to: + found the needed report, + tag them, + talk about the report, + track easily contributions to each one, + link "related" reports, different flavors of the same one, + vote them, + add easily to Koha, + get statistic information, and much more. I'm not sure what is the best solution. An ad hoc web development? A friend suggest me Semanticscuttle . Trying to at least make things more tidy I create: SQL Reports Library in templates (equivalent to the usual but using mediawiki templates). This use Template:Report . Some things happens (or will happen) with JQuery and SQL libraries: A wiki page is not a good library/database. Regards, Pablo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bob at calyx.net.au Mon May 11 00:36:38 2015 From: bob at calyx.net.au (Bob Birchall) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 08:36:38 +1000 Subject: [Koha-devel] Learning Tools Interoperability In-Reply-To: <554B530B.5030900@abunchofthings.net> References: <554ACF7B.4010701@calyx.net.au> <554B530B.5030900@abunchofthings.net> Message-ID: <554FDD76.2070904@calyx.net.au> On 07/05/15 21:56, Mirko Tietgen wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Bob Birchall schrieb am 07.05.2015 > >> Hi, I've been asked if Koha has support for LTI and if not, is it >> in a road map? I guess they mean this: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_Tools_Interoperability >> >> Its not something I have heard of before. Any thoughts? > I came across this a while back when I started using > BigBlueButton.[1] This is more like an overview of things I found > than an opinion on LTI support in Koha. > > Basically there are hosts (called ?consumers?) and plugins (called > ?tools?) that are supposed to allow easy interoperability. Hosts can > be learning management systems like moodle[2] (often used by german > universities), tools can be a lot of different things. I found a > list here.[3] > > There seems to be only a small number of Free Software tools > available (only searched the page for ?open?, did not check all > corresponding websites). > > When I did my research, I was thinking of Koha as a host, so I could > have BigBlueButton as a tool in Koha. It's also possible the person > that asked you was thinking of Koha as a tool within a different > host (have the OPAC or some administration within an LMS maybe?). > The latter would probably only work on a per-Koha-module-level. > > I did not find the specs the last time and thought it was only > available to members (and lost interest quickly). Seems like that is > not true. I have not had a look at it but I have the link here so > I'll add it.[4] This is the first version, others can be found in > the overview page.[5] > > LTI certification for software seems to be bound to membership. > Assuming Koha as a community project would be considered a > non-profit organisation, that is $500 US per year.[6] If i'm not > mistaken, it is possible to implement LTI without certification. > > -- Mirko > > > [1] http://bigbluebutton.org/ > [2] https://moodle.org > [3] http://developers.imsglobal.org/catalog.html > [4] http://www.imsglobal.org/lti/blti/bltiv1p0/ltiBLTIimgv1p0.html > [5] http://www.imsglobal.org/lti/index.html > [6] http://www.imsglobal.org/cc/jointhealliance.cfm Hi Mirko, This is great information, thank you. Its been suggested to me, depending on the users' precise needs, that an effective approach might be to bolt Koha and Moodle (which has LTI support) together. I'll find out more about that. Thanks and regards, Bob From indradg at gmail.com Mon May 11 02:15:39 2015 From: indradg at gmail.com (Indranil Das Gupta) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 05:45:39 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] Field width for currency.currency is inadequate Message-ID: Hi all, The database field currency.currency is defined as VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL. This needs to be increased e.g. set as VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL. The rationale: a) While it is possible to accomodate 'US Dollar' in that width, for many currencies this space is inadequate e.g. 'East Caribbean Dollar', 'Indian Rupee' or 'Tanzanian Shilling'. b) Further, in the 'New currency' addition form, the maxlength and size attributes are set as 50, and allows user to enter long names as examples above. While saving the record, it is truncated to VARCHAR(10). I propose the following: 1/ Alter the currency.currency field to VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL from VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL. 2/ Change the 'maxlength' attribute in the template to 255 (to match column property) The bug and the patches are here http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14179 cheers -idg -- Indranil Das Gupta Phone : +91-98300-20971 Blog : http://indradg.randomink.org/blog IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net Twitter : indradg -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please exchange editable Office documents only in ODF Format. No other format is acceptable. Support Open Standards. For a free editor supporting ODF, please visit LibreOffice - http://www.documentfoundation.org From mtompset at hotmail.com Mon May 11 02:49:27 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 20:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] Field width for currency.currency is inadequate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Greetings, Please see http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14179#c7 GPML, Mark Tompsett From kyle.m.hall at gmail.com Mon May 11 17:37:06 2015 From: kyle.m.hall at gmail.com (Kyle Hall) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] LAST CALL - RFC for Bug 14048 - Change RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn to be branch specific Message-ID: Hey all, I posted this on April 22, and received no feedback. I just wanted to give everyone a second chance to post any feedback on the development plan for bug 14048. If you have any comments about it, please let me know! Otherwise, I'll assume everyone is ok with the development plan, and I can go ahead with writing this feature. Thanks! Kyle http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14048 Some library systems would like to be able to control the behavior of RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn Expected outcome: To make the RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn system preference branch specific Plan of Attack: 1) Add new field 'refund_lost_item_fee_on_return' to the 'branches' table 2) Pre-populate this field with the system preference value for RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn 3) Remove the system preference RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn 4) Replace uses of RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn with a lookup of the value of branches.refund_lost_item_fee_on_return 5) Use HomeOrHolding to control whether the home branch or the holding branch of the item is used to determine this. 6) Reveal the setting in the branches editor http://www.kylehall.info ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com ) Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org ) Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org ) Mill Run Technology Solutions ( http://millruntech.com ) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cgdavis at uintah.utah.gov Mon May 11 18:04:57 2015 From: cgdavis at uintah.utah.gov (Christopher Davis) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:04:57 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] LAST CALL - RFC for Bug 14048 - Change RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn to be branch specific In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Kyle, It looks good to me Thank you, Christopher Davis, MLS Systems & E-Services Librarian Uintah County Library cgdavis at uintah.utah.gov (435) 789-0091 ext.261 uintahlibrary.org basinlibraries.org facebook.com/uintahcountylibrary On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Kyle Hall wrote: > Hey all, I posted this on April 22, and received no feedback. I just > wanted to give everyone a second chance to post any feedback on the > development plan for bug 14048. If you have any comments about it, please > let me know! Otherwise, I'll assume everyone is ok with the development > plan, and I can go ahead with writing this feature. > > Thanks! > Kyle > > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14048 > > Some library systems would like to be able to control the behavior of > RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn > > Expected outcome: To make the RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn system preference > branch specific > > Plan of Attack: > 1) Add new field 'refund_lost_item_fee_on_return' to the 'branches' table > 2) Pre-populate this field with the system preference value for > RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn > 3) Remove the system preference RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn > 4) Replace uses of RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn with a lookup of the value of > branches.refund_lost_item_fee_on_return > 5) Use HomeOrHolding to control whether the home branch or the holding > branch of the item is used to determine this. > 6) Reveal the setting in the branches editor > > > http://www.kylehall.info > ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com ) > Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org ) > Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org ) > Mill Run Technology Solutions ( http://millruntech.com ) > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kyle.m.hall at gmail.com Tue May 12 12:56:03 2015 From: kyle.m.hall at gmail.com (Kyle Hall) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 06:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] LAST CALL - RFC for Bug 14048 - Change RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn to be branch specific In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Christopher! http://www.kylehall.info ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com ) Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org ) Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org ) Mill Run Technology Solutions ( http://millruntech.com ) On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Christopher Davis wrote: > Kyle, > > It looks good to me > > Thank you, > > Christopher Davis, MLS > Systems & E-Services Librarian > Uintah County Library > cgdavis at uintah.utah.gov > (435) 789-0091 ext.261 > uintahlibrary.org > basinlibraries.org > facebook.com/uintahcountylibrary > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Kyle Hall wrote: > >> Hey all, I posted this on April 22, and received no feedback. I just >> wanted to give everyone a second chance to post any feedback on the >> development plan for bug 14048. If you have any comments about it, please >> let me know! Otherwise, I'll assume everyone is ok with the development >> plan, and I can go ahead with writing this feature. >> >> Thanks! >> Kyle >> >> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14048 >> >> Some library systems would like to be able to control the behavior of >> RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn >> >> Expected outcome: To make the RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn system preference >> branch specific >> >> Plan of Attack: >> 1) Add new field 'refund_lost_item_fee_on_return' to the 'branches' table >> 2) Pre-populate this field with the system preference value for >> RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn >> 3) Remove the system preference RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn >> 4) Replace uses of RefundLostItemFeeOnReturn with a lookup of the value >> of branches.refund_lost_item_fee_on_return >> 5) Use HomeOrHolding to control whether the home branch or the holding >> branch of the item is used to determine this. >> 6) Reveal the setting in the branches editor >> >> >> http://www.kylehall.info >> ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com ) >> Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org ) >> Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org ) >> Mill Run Technology Solutions ( http://millruntech.com ) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl Thu May 14 16:04:16 2015 From: M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl (Marcel de Rooy) Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:04:16 +0000 Subject: [Koha-devel] Plugin marc21_linking_section.pl Message-ID: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA315ACCD64F@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Hi all, Is anyone of you using this plugin? I can launch it, search for a record. But if I click the Choose button, nothing happens. (I would expect to get back something into the field that launched the plugin.) If you use it, please let me know what I am doing wrong :) See also bug 13437 which makes some changes to various marc21 plugins including this one. Thanks, Marcel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Katrin.Fischer.83 at web.de Thu May 14 16:21:06 2015 From: Katrin.Fischer.83 at web.de (Katrin Fischer) Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 16:21:06 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Plugin marc21_linking_section.pl In-Reply-To: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA315ACCD64F@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> References: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA315ACCD64F@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Message-ID: <5554AF52.3070005@web.de> Hi Marcel, I tested it a while ago, I wrote up the steps on bugzilla: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12695#c3 Did you link it to 773$9? Hope this helps, Katrin Am 14.05.2015 um 16:04 schrieb Marcel de Rooy: > Hi all, > > > > Is anyone of you using this plugin? > > I can launch it, search for a record. > > But if I click the Choose button, nothing happens. (I would expect to > get back something into the field that launched the plugin.) > > > > If you use it, please let me know what I am doing wrong :) > > > > See also bug 13437 which makes some changes to various marc21 plugins > including this one. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Marcel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > From z.tajoli at cineca.it Thu May 14 16:25:28 2015 From: z.tajoli at cineca.it (Tajoli Zeno) Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 16:25:28 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Plugin marc21_linking_section.pl In-Reply-To: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA315ACCD64F@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> References: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA315ACCD64F@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Message-ID: <5554B058.80504@cineca.it> Hi, Il 14/05/2015 16:04, Marcel de Rooy ha scritto: > Is anyone of you using this plugin? I use this plugin in Koha 3.12.06 and it works. > I can launch it, search for a record. > > But if I click the Choose button, nothing happens. (I would expect to > get back something into the field that launched the plugin.) It insert (into he field that launched the plugin.) $w -> 001 of searched record $t -> field 245$a of searched records > If you use it, please let me know what I am doing wrong :) > > See also bug 13437 which makes some changes to various marc21 plugins > including this one. I think there is same bug in the code. Do you test it on 3.18.x or on 3.20-beta ? Bye Zeno Tajoli -- Dr. Zeno Tajoli Servizi Innovativi -- Automazione Biblioteche z.tajoli at cineca.it fax +39 02 2135520 CINECA - Sede operativa di Segrate From tomascohen at gmail.com Thu May 14 19:58:45 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:58:45 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Dev meeting to talk about the upcoming release: May 19th Message-ID: I'd like you to join the next meeting. It will be focused, exclusively, on Koha 3.20. It will probably be a short meeting, unless something happens before the meeting that needs broader discussion. Kind regards Link: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Development_IRC_meeting_19_May_2015 -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mirko at abunchofthings.net Thu May 14 20:02:50 2015 From: mirko at abunchofthings.net (Mirko Tietgen) Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:02:50 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Learning Tools Interoperability In-Reply-To: <554FDD76.2070904@calyx.net.au> References: <554ACF7B.4010701@calyx.net.au> <554B530B.5030900@abunchofthings.net> <554FDD76.2070904@calyx.net.au> Message-ID: <5554E34A.9030100@abunchofthings.net> Hi Bob, Bob Birchall schrieb am 10.05.2015 > Hi Mirko, > This is great information, thank you. Its been suggested to me, > depending on the users' precise needs, that an effective approach > might be to bolt Koha and Moodle (which has LTI support) together. > I'll find out more about that. > Thanks and regards, > Bob I'd be interested to hear more details, please keep me/ the list updated if there are things you can share. -- Mirko -- Mirko Tietgen mirko at abunchofthings.net http://koha.abunchofthings.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From kohanews at gmail.com Fri May 15 19:47:05 2015 From: kohanews at gmail.com (kohanews) Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:47:05 -0700 Subject: [Koha-devel] Call for news: May newsletter Message-ID: <55563119.1000303@gmail.com> Fellow Koha users ~ I'm collecting news for the May newsletter. Send anything noteworthy to: k o h a news AT gmail dot com News criteria: --------------------------- * News items can be of any length. * Anything and everything Koha. * Submit by the 28th. If you are working on an interesting project or development related to Koha, please let me know and I'll include it in the development section. -- Chad Roseburg Editor, Koha Newsletter From kohanews at gmail.com Fri May 15 19:48:26 2015 From: kohanews at gmail.com (kohanews) Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:48:26 -0700 Subject: [Koha-devel] Call for development news: May newsletter Message-ID: <5556316A.5000908@gmail.com> Koha Development community ~ If you have any bugs or projects you'd like to highlight or promote in the May newsletter, please let me know. Maybe it'll attract some additional eyes, testers and sign-offs. k o h a news AT gmail dot com Thank you! -- Chad Roseburg Editor, Koha Newsletter From M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl Mon May 18 11:35:19 2015 From: M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl (Marcel de Rooy) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:35:19 +0000 Subject: [Koha-devel] Plugin marc21_linking_section.pl In-Reply-To: <5554B058.80504@cineca.it> References: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA315ACCD64F@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> <5554B058.80504@cineca.it> Message-ID: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA315ACD6F99@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Thanks Katrin and Zeno. > I use this plugin in Koha 3.12.06 and it works. > Do you test it on 3.18.x or on 3.20-beta ? Yes, it works now on master. From jonathan.druart at biblibre.com Mon May 18 11:55:41 2015 From: jonathan.druart at biblibre.com (Jonathan Druart) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:55:41 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Dev meeting to talk about the upcoming release: May 19th In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Could you confirm the time please? "19 May 2015, 15UTC" But the link on timeandate.com is 21UTC 2015-05-14 18:58 GMT+01:00 Tomas Cohen Arazi : > I'd like you to join the next meeting. It will be focused, exclusively, on > Koha 3.20. It will probably be a short meeting, unless something happens > before the meeting that needs broader discussion. > > Kind regards > > Link: > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Development_IRC_meeting_19_May_2015 > > > > -- > Tom?s Cohen Arazi > Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica > Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba > ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 > GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ From tomascohen at gmail.com Mon May 18 17:39:42 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:39:42 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] SQL Reports Library v2.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Pablo, I'm interested on making the wiki simpler to browse and maintain. If you think you can have the time to work on that, just let us know what you need from our side. If you come up with something interesting i'm pretty sure we'll embrace it. Thanks for the effort on making better docs. On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Pablo Bianchi wrote: > Hi, > > I count more than 300 reports on *SQL Reports Library*, is getting a > little bit out of control. Become difficult to: > + found the needed report, > + tag them, > + talk about the report, > + track easily contributions to each one, > + link "related" reports, different flavors of the same one, > + vote them, > + add easily to Koha, > + get statistic information, > and much more. > > I'm not sure what is the best solution. An ad hoc web development? A > friend suggest me Semanticscuttle > . > Trying to at least make things more tidy I create: SQL Reports Library in > templates > (equivalent > to the usual but using mediawiki templates). This use Template:Report > . > > Some things happens (or will happen) with JQuery and SQL libraries: A wiki > page is not a good library/database. > > Regards, > Pablo > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From barton at bywatersolutions.com Mon May 18 19:05:41 2015 From: barton at bywatersolutions.com (Barton Chittenden) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] SQL Reports Library v2.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Pablo, I'll second Tomas' sentiment -- I refer to the reports library on a regular basis. I ran across your SQL Reports Library in templates last week, and it caught my interest. I would be willing to spend some time working on converting the old SQL Reports Library. Thanks, --Barton On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote: > Pablo, I'm interested on making the wiki simpler to browse and maintain. > If you think you can have the time to work on that, just let us know what > you need from our side. > > If you come up with something interesting i'm pretty sure we'll embrace it. > > Thanks for the effort on making better docs. > > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Pablo Bianchi > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I count more than 300 reports on *SQL Reports Library*, is getting a >> little bit out of control. Become difficult to: >> + found the needed report, >> + tag them, >> + talk about the report, >> + track easily contributions to each one, >> + link "related" reports, different flavors of the same one, >> + vote them, >> + add easily to Koha, >> + get statistic information, >> and much more. >> >> I'm not sure what is the best solution. An ad hoc web development? A >> friend suggest me Semanticscuttle >> . >> Trying to at least make things more tidy I create: SQL Reports Library >> in templates >> (equivalent >> to the usual but using mediawiki templates). This use Template:Report >> . >> >> Some things happens (or will happen) with JQuery and SQL libraries: A >> wiki page is not a good library/database. >> >> Regards, >> Pablo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > > > > -- > Tom?s Cohen Arazi > Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica > Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba > ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 > GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtompset at hotmail.com Mon May 18 19:33:13 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] SQL Reports Library v2.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Greetings, Obviously others have agreed, because there are bits and pieces elsewhere. Just search for ?sql reports? http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/SQL_Reports_Holds http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/SQL_Reports_Library OBSOLETE: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/3.2_SQL_Reports_Library The biggest problem is metadata tags for each report so they can be found more easily. I like the template notion put forward. GPML, Mark Tompsett From: Pablo Bianchi Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 12:56 AM To: Koha-devel Subject: [Koha-devel] SQL Reports Library v2.0 Hi, I count more than 300 reports on SQL Reports Library, is getting a little bit out of control. Become difficult to: + found the needed report, + tag them, + talk about the report, + track easily contributions to each one, + link "related" reports, different flavors of the same one, + vote them, + add easily to Koha, + get statistic information, and much more. I'm not sure what is the best solution. An ad hoc web development? A friend suggest me Semanticscuttle. Trying to at least make things more tidy I create: SQL Reports Library in templates (equivalent to the usual but using mediawiki templates). This use Template:Report. Some things happens (or will happen) with JQuery and SQL libraries: A wiki page is not a good library/database. Regards, Pablo -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From indradg at gmail.com Mon May 18 19:34:32 2015 From: indradg at gmail.com (Indranil Das Gupta) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:04:32 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] [CROSS-POST] does the language sw[itcher really need that much screen real estate? Message-ID: Hi, The language switcher takes up a lot of space at the bottom. it also had issues of being not always visible (http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11057). Is there a specific design / UX issue (that I may be unaware of) why it is not implemented as a simple drop down from the masthead toolbar? thanks :) -- Indranil Das Gupta Phone : +91-98300-20971 Blog : http://indradg.randomink.org/blog IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net Twitter : indradg -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please exchange editable Office documents only in ODF Format. No other format is acceptable. Support Open Standards. For a free editor supporting ODF, please visit LibreOffice - http://www.documentfoundation.org From tomascohen at gmail.com Tue May 19 17:12:29 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 12:12:29 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Dev meeting to talk about the upcoming release: May 19th In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm sorry, but I won't make it to the meeting (familly issues). The meeting could take place without me. The main subject is taking notes of any problems you might have found on 3.20 so I work on them tomorrow. Also, get precise information about the status of the dependencies required for Bug 8007 (Discharge management), because the release will depend on their availability on the repository. Robin wrote last night on the IRC that PDF::Writer was ready, but it remains uncertain if we will have PDF::fromHTML on the repo on time. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote: > I'd like you to join the next meeting. It will be focused, exclusively, on > Koha 3.20. It will probably be a short meeting, unless something happens > before the meeting that needs broader discussion. > > Kind regards > > Link: > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Development_IRC_meeting_19_May_2015 > > > > -- > Tom?s Cohen Arazi > Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica > Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba > ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 > GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F > -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pablo.bianchi at gmail.com Tue May 19 20:29:58 2015 From: pablo.bianchi at gmail.com (Pablo Bianchi) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:29:58 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] SQL Reports Library v2.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm very happy this brings enthusiasm! In first place I think we should convert the big list to the template form (probably the title will be repeated on template field). Maybe we need some privileges on mediawiki, I need to study more about it (mediawiki and their API), but the idea might be not just split the library on other articles, just *transclude *them, call all the templates with a giben label. Something like this ? An expert on mediawiki API would be great. 2015-05-18 14:05 GMT-03:00 Barton Chittenden : > Pablo, > > I'll second Tomas' sentiment -- I refer to the reports library on a > regular basis. I ran across your SQL Reports Library in templates last > week, and it caught my interest. I would be willing to spend some time > working on converting the old SQL Reports Library. > > Thanks, > > --Barton > > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi > wrote: > >> Pablo, I'm interested on making the wiki simpler to browse and maintain. >> If you think you can have the time to work on that, just let us know what >> you need from our side. >> >> If you come up with something interesting i'm pretty sure we'll embrace >> it. >> >> Thanks for the effort on making better docs. >> >> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Pablo Bianchi >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I count more than 300 reports on *SQL Reports Library*, is getting a >>> little bit out of control. Become difficult to: >>> + found the needed report, >>> + tag them, >>> + talk about the report, >>> + track easily contributions to each one, >>> + link "related" reports, different flavors of the same one, >>> + vote them, >>> + add easily to Koha, >>> + get statistic information, >>> and much more. >>> >>> I'm not sure what is the best solution. An ad hoc web development? A >>> friend suggest me Semanticscuttle >>> . >>> Trying to at least make things more tidy I create: SQL Reports Library >>> in templates >>> (equivalent >>> to the usual but using mediawiki templates). This use Template:Report >>> . >>> >>> Some things happens (or will happen) with JQuery and SQL libraries: A >>> wiki page is not a good library/database. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Pablo >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Koha-devel mailing list >>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Tom?s Cohen Arazi >> Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica >> Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba >> ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 >> GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomascohen at gmail.com Tue May 19 20:34:38 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:34:38 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] SQL Reports Library v2.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: As long as it is still simple for the average joe to contribute their sample query i'm fine. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Pablo Bianchi wrote: > I'm very happy this brings enthusiasm! > In first place I think we should convert the big list to the template form > (probably the title will be repeated on template field). > Maybe we need some privileges on mediawiki, I need to study more about it > (mediawiki and their API), but the idea might be not just split the library > on other articles, just *transclude *them, call all the templates with a > giben label. Something like this > ? > An expert on mediawiki API would be great. > > > 2015-05-18 14:05 GMT-03:00 Barton Chittenden > : > > Pablo, >> >> I'll second Tomas' sentiment -- I refer to the reports library on a >> regular basis. I ran across your SQL Reports Library in templates last >> week, and it caught my interest. I would be willing to spend some time >> working on converting the old SQL Reports Library. >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Barton >> >> >> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi > > wrote: >> >>> Pablo, I'm interested on making the wiki simpler to browse and maintain. >>> If you think you can have the time to work on that, just let us know what >>> you need from our side. >>> >>> If you come up with something interesting i'm pretty sure we'll embrace >>> it. >>> >>> Thanks for the effort on making better docs. >>> >>> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Pablo Bianchi >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I count more than 300 reports on *SQL Reports Library*, is getting a >>>> little bit out of control. Become difficult to: >>>> + found the needed report, >>>> + tag them, >>>> + talk about the report, >>>> + track easily contributions to each one, >>>> + link "related" reports, different flavors of the same one, >>>> + vote them, >>>> + add easily to Koha, >>>> + get statistic information, >>>> and much more. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure what is the best solution. An ad hoc web development? A >>>> friend suggest me Semanticscuttle >>>> . >>>> Trying to at least make things more tidy I create: SQL Reports Library >>>> in templates >>>> (equivalent >>>> to the usual but using mediawiki templates). This use Template:Report >>>> . >>>> >>>> Some things happens (or will happen) with JQuery and SQL libraries: A >>>> wiki page is not a good library/database. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Pablo >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Koha-devel mailing list >>>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tom?s Cohen Arazi >>> Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica >>> Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba >>> ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 >>> GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Koha-devel mailing list >>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > > -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robin at catalyst.net.nz Fri May 22 06:11:27 2015 From: robin at catalyst.net.nz (Robin Sheat) Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 16:11:27 +1200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Packaging of Koha dependencies Message-ID: <1432267887.25145.44.camel@catalyst.net.nz> With my package manager hat on, I want to introduce some general guidelines for adding dependencies to the Koha project, because some recent approaches have been problematic and sucked up a lot more time than they should have. Apologies in advance for the giant wall of text. It's late afternoon on a Friday. First, the easy case: * If the dependency you want to add is in wheezy and jessie (being aware of versions) already, then that's fine. We try not to introduce these within a monthly release unless there's a good reason, but for something going into a new major release, that's totally OK. Otherwise: * Figure out the minimum version that'll work. Don't just add the latest version because that's what you grabbed out of CPAN. If it works with a more commonly distributed version then you've saved many people a lot of time by declaring that (not just me, but anyone trying to use it on other distributions too.) A bit more guidance on that here: http://mail.librecat.org/pipermail/librecat-dev/2015-May/000380.html * If you can reasonably avoid adding a dependency, do it. It's not always possible, but some things don't need to be there because it saves a few minutes of coding. If it saves you hours, then it's probably reasonable to add it. * Small, standalone modules will in most cases be easy to deal with. Things with many complex dependencies will not. The latter may cause backporting the module to be impossible, in which case it just won't happen. * Point it out to me early, not right before it's going to be released. On one hand, I can tell you then if it's going to be impossible. On the other, all the testers and QA people will have access to the dependency if it's already in the repo when it comes time for signing off, making their lives that much easier. If I hear that we need a package once it's gone through everything (and too often it's QA that points this out to me, that's really bad), your patch _will_ be delayed and may miss a release. * Check the copyright. I'm not going to redistribute a module just because it's in CPAN. As far as I can tell, being in CPAN doesn't cause a default license to be applied, so if the module doesn't have something that says that it can be redistributed, the default position is that it is illegal to redistribute it. * All modules that I create are submitted into Debian. If they don't get into Debian, then they don't get into Koha. Debian is pretty strict, so in turn I have to be pretty strict. The reason for this is, in part, that it means that the amount of modules I have to care about won't (hopefully) just keep getting bigger, there's a chance it'll go down too over time. * Most modules that are unpackaged have issues that prevent them going into debian. These are found by running the "lintian" tool over a package. Usually they're quick and easy. Sometimes there are a lot of them. If there are a lot of them, I'm going to delegate the fixing of them to the people who want this module in. I'm happy to coach you through this process and handle the basic things, but I don't always have time to spend days wrangling your dependency into a good state. * I wrote a guide to help you get started here: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Building_Debian_Dependencies * If you don't help out with this when necessary, your dependency is likely to go to the bottom of my packaging queue. If you do, it'll probably be near the top :) * To get a feel for something being easy to package, do: dh-make-perl --pkg-perl --build --cpan Module::Name with the lintian config set up from that wiki page. If you get only a few lintian errors (and some you'll see in every case), and you get a .deb file out then end, that's a good sign. Even better if from there you tidy it up, commit it to alioth, and ask me on the relevant bug to have a look over it for you :) There's a fair bit of stuff here, but essentially the purpose boils down to three points: 1. my time is limited and some of this is taking away from real client work that is needed for Catalyst to be able to sponsor me to do this in the first place, 2. I don't want to be a bottleneck that slows down your work getting into Koha, and 3. the more people that have some experience with this stuff, the more people can help things get done. 1. You can also get your name in lights as a contributor to the Debian project this way. I hope you got this far! Thanks, -- Robin Sheat Catalyst IT Ltd. ? +64 4 803 2204 GPG: 5FA7 4B49 1E4D CAA4 4C38 8505 77F5 B724 F871 3BDF -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From indradg at gmail.com Sun May 24 14:35:30 2015 From: indradg at gmail.com (Indranil Das Gupta) Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 18:05:30 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] [CROSS-POST] does the language sw[itcher really need that much screen real estate? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Kia ora On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Indranil Das Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > The language switcher takes up a lot of space at the bottom. it also > had issues of being not always visible > (http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11057). > > Is there a specific design / UX issue (that I may be unaware of) why > it is not implemented as a simple drop down from the masthead toolbar? There is now a new patch which positions the lang chooser at the masthead. Users' are being requested to offer their inputs whether: a) we stick to the way it is currently (at the bottom of the page and with UX issues unless the patch from 11057 is applied) (Reference - http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11057) OR b) we switch to the new position on the masthead using the patch from 14252? (Reference - http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14252) View on 1366x768 pixel resolution - http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=39369 View on small mobile device resolution - http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=39434 thanks :-) -- Indranil Das Gupta Phone : +91-98300-20971 Blog : http://indradg.randomink.org/blog IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net Twitter : indradg -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please exchange editable Office documents only in ODF Format. No other format is acceptable. Support Open Standards. For a free editor supporting ODF, please visit LibreOffice - http://www.documentfoundation.org From irma at calyx.net.au Sun May 24 17:40:02 2015 From: irma at calyx.net.au (Irma Birchall) Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 01:40:02 +1000 Subject: [Koha-devel] [CROSS-POST] does the language sw[itcher really need that much screen real estate? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Indranil ++ We vote for b) "we switch to the new position on the masthead using the patch from 14252" Nice improvement. Thank you. With best regards, Irma ------------------ Irma Birchall CEO & Founder : CALYX information essentials Koha LMS and Omeka implementations and professional services T: +61 (2) 9437 4848 ~ M: +61 (0) 413 510 717 irma at calyx.net.au ~ www.calyx.net.au ~ http://koha-community.org/ For Koha-oz User Group communications join e-list: http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-oz On 24 May 2015 at 22:35, Indranil Das Gupta wrote: > Kia ora > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Indranil Das Gupta > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The language switcher takes up a lot of space at the bottom. it also > > had issues of being not always visible > > (http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11057). > > > > Is there a specific design / UX issue (that I may be unaware of) why > > it is not implemented as a simple drop down from the masthead toolbar? > > There is now a new patch which positions the lang chooser at the > masthead. Users' are being requested to offer their inputs whether: > > a) we stick to the way it is currently (at the bottom of the page and > with UX issues unless the patch from 11057 is applied) > > (Reference - > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11057) > > OR > > b) we switch to the new position on the masthead using the patch from > 14252? > > (Reference - > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14252) > > View on 1366x768 pixel resolution - > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=39369 > > View on small mobile device resolution - > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=39434 > > thanks :-) > > -- > Indranil Das Gupta > > Phone : +91-98300-20971 > Blog : http://indradg.randomink.org/blog > IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net > Twitter : indradg > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Please exchange editable Office documents only in ODF Format. No other > format is acceptable. Support Open Standards. > > For a free editor supporting ODF, please visit LibreOffice - > http://www.documentfoundation.org > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl Mon May 25 10:58:52 2015 From: M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl (Marcel de Rooy) Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 08:58:52 +0000 Subject: [Koha-devel] [CROSS-POST] does the language sw[itcher really need that much screen real estate? In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA315ACE1CD4@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> I like the new position for Languages too. But it gets kind of crowdy on that top bar (when the user is logged in and has a longer name..) Imo Languages has more rights to be there than e.g. Search history. Could we move Search history now to the bar with Advanced Search and Authority Search? Could we also combine "Welcome, Marcel.." and Logout ? Only Show the name and provide a dropdown with User options and Logout ? ________________________________ Van: koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org [koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org] namens Irma Birchall [irma at calyx.net.au] Verzonden: zondag 24 mei 2015 17:40 Aan: Indranil Das Gupta CC: koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org; koha Onderwerp: Re: [Koha-devel] [CROSS-POST] does the language sw[itcher really need that much screen real estate? Hi Indranil ++ We vote for b) "we switch to the new position on the masthead using the patch from 14252" Nice improvement. Thank you. With best regards, Irma ------------------ Irma Birchall CEO & Founder : CALYX information essentials Koha LMS and Omeka implementations and professional services T: +61 (2) 9437 4848 ~ M: +61 (0) 413 510 717 irma at calyx.net.au ~ www.calyx.net.au ~ http://koha-community.org/ For Koha-oz User Group communications join e-list: http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-oz On 24 May 2015 at 22:35, Indranil Das Gupta > wrote: Kia ora On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Indranil Das Gupta > wrote: > Hi, > > The language switcher takes up a lot of space at the bottom. it also > had issues of being not always visible > (http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11057). > > Is there a specific design / UX issue (that I may be unaware of) why > it is not implemented as a simple drop down from the masthead toolbar? There is now a new patch which positions the lang chooser at the masthead. Users' are being requested to offer their inputs whether: a) we stick to the way it is currently (at the bottom of the page and with UX issues unless the patch from 11057 is applied) (Reference - http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11057) OR b) we switch to the new position on the masthead using the patch from 14252? (Reference - http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14252) View on 1366x768 pixel resolution - http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=39369 View on small mobile device resolution - http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=39434 thanks :-) -- Indranil Das Gupta Phone : +91-98300-20971 Blog : http://indradg.randomink.org/blog IRC : indradg on irc://irc.freenode.net Twitter : indradg -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Please exchange editable Office documents only in ODF Format. No other format is acceptable. Support Open Standards. For a free editor supporting ODF, please visit LibreOffice - http://www.documentfoundation.org _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hadzic_ahmed at hotmail.com Mon May 25 13:56:57 2015 From: hadzic_ahmed at hotmail.com (Ahmed Hadzic) Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 11:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Koha-devel] How to get CAS based Single Sign On working? References: Message-ID: Hi Kale, I need to authenticate KOHA with CAS. As I see, you have implemented KOHA with CAS and I would be thankful if you could share your documentation. Kind regards From julian.maurice at biblibre.com Mon May 25 15:04:24 2015 From: julian.maurice at biblibre.com (Julian Maurice) Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 15:04:24 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Packaging of Koha dependencies In-Reply-To: <1432267887.25145.44.camel@catalyst.net.nz> References: <1432267887.25145.44.camel@catalyst.net.nz> Message-ID: <55631DD8.2080707@biblibre.com> Hi Robin, I have a few questions related to bug 13799 [1]. > the easy case a) As the required version of Mojolicious is in jessie, does this mean that we don't have to package it for wheezy ? I thought backporting to wheezy was still needed since jessie was released just a month ago. > If you don't help out... b) I understand that packaging Swagger2 has fallen to the bottom of your queue, and you are requiring help to do it, correct ? If so, I can help, just tell me. Apart from that, I think this mail deserves a page in the wiki. [1] http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13799 Le 22/05/2015 06:11, Robin Sheat a ?crit : > With my package manager hat on, I want to introduce some general > guidelines for adding dependencies to the Koha project, because some > recent approaches have been problematic and sucked up a lot more time > than they should have. > > Apologies in advance for the giant wall of text. It's late afternoon on > a Friday. > > First, the easy case: > * If the dependency you want to add is in wheezy and jessie (being > aware of versions) already, then that's fine. We try not to > introduce these within a monthly release unless there's a good > reason, but for something going into a new major release, that's > totally OK. > > Otherwise: > * Figure out the minimum version that'll work. Don't just add the > latest version because that's what you grabbed out of CPAN. If > it works with a more commonly distributed version then you've > saved many people a lot of time by declaring that (not just me, > but anyone trying to use it on other distributions too.) A bit > more guidance on that here: > http://mail.librecat.org/pipermail/librecat-dev/2015-May/000380.html > * If you can reasonably avoid adding a dependency, do it. It's not > always possible, but some things don't need to be there because > it saves a few minutes of coding. If it saves you hours, then > it's probably reasonable to add it. > * Small, standalone modules will in most cases be easy to deal > with. Things with many complex dependencies will not. The latter > may cause backporting the module to be impossible, in which case > it just won't happen. > * Point it out to me early, not right before it's going to be > released. On one hand, I can tell you then if it's going to be > impossible. On the other, all the testers and QA people will > have access to the dependency if it's already in the repo when > it comes time for signing off, making their lives that much > easier. If I hear that we need a package once it's gone through > everything (and too often it's QA that points this out to me, > that's really bad), your patch _will_ be delayed and may miss a > release. > * Check the copyright. I'm not going to redistribute a module just > because it's in CPAN. As far as I can tell, being in CPAN > doesn't cause a default license to be applied, so if the module > doesn't have something that says that it can be redistributed, > the default position is that it is illegal to redistribute it. > * All modules that I create are submitted into Debian. If they > don't get into Debian, then they don't get into Koha. Debian is > pretty strict, so in turn I have to be pretty strict. The reason > for this is, in part, that it means that the amount of modules I > have to care about won't (hopefully) just keep getting bigger, > there's a chance it'll go down too over time. > * Most modules that are unpackaged have issues that prevent them > going into debian. These are found by running the "lintian" tool > over a package. Usually they're quick and easy. Sometimes there > are a lot of them. If there are a lot of them, I'm going to > delegate the fixing of them to the people who want this module > in. I'm happy to coach you through this process and handle the > basic things, but I don't always have time to spend days > wrangling your dependency into a good state. > * I wrote a guide to help you get started here: > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Building_Debian_Dependencies > * If you don't help out with this when necessary, your > dependency is likely to go to the bottom of my packaging > queue. If you do, it'll probably be near the top :) > * To get a feel for something being easy to package, do: > dh-make-perl --pkg-perl --build --cpan Module::Name > with the lintian config set up from that wiki page. If you get > only a few lintian errors (and some you'll see in every case), > and you get a .deb file out then end, that's a good sign. Even > better if from there you tidy it up, commit it to alioth, and > ask me on the relevant bug to have a look over it for you :) > > There's a fair bit of stuff here, but essentially the purpose boils down > to three points: > 1. my time is limited and some of this is taking away from real > client work that is needed for Catalyst to be able to sponsor me > to do this in the first place, > 2. I don't want to be a bottleneck that slows down your work > getting into Koha, and > 3. the more people that have some experience with this stuff, the > more people can help things get done. > 1. You can also get your name in lights as a contributor to > the Debian project this way. > > I hope you got this far! > > Thanks, > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Julian Maurice BibLibre From robin at catalyst.net.nz Tue May 26 00:44:00 2015 From: robin at catalyst.net.nz (Robin Sheat) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:44:00 +1200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Packaging of Koha dependencies In-Reply-To: <55631DD8.2080707@biblibre.com> References: <1432267887.25145.44.camel@catalyst.net.nz> <55631DD8.2080707@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <1432593840.25145.69.camel@catalyst.net.nz> Julian Maurice schreef op ma 25-05-2015 om 15:04 [+0200]: > > the easy case > > a) As the required version of Mojolicious is in jessie, does this > mean > that we don't have to package it for wheezy ? I thought backporting > to > wheezy was still needed since jessie was released just a month ago. We will need to package it for wheezy as it's not there. > > If you don't help out... > > b) I understand that packaging Swagger2 has fallen to the bottom of > your > queue, and you are requiring help to do it, correct ? If so, I can > help, > just tell me. No, it just fell to the bottom of my queue because more urgent pre-release things got in my way, I hope to have a look at it again this week and think I have solutions to the issues that I had. > Apart from that, I think this mail deserves a page in the wiki. Yeah, I plan to do that some time soon. -- Robin Sheat Catalyst IT Ltd. ? +64 4 803 2204 GPG: 5FA7 4B49 1E4D CAA4 4C38 8505 77F5 B724 F871 3BDF -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fridolin.somers at biblibre.com Tue May 26 09:19:51 2015 From: fridolin.somers at biblibre.com (Fridolin SOMERS) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:19:51 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Packaging of Koha dependencies In-Reply-To: <1432267887.25145.44.camel@catalyst.net.nz> References: <1432267887.25145.44.camel@catalyst.net.nz> Message-ID: <55641E97.1030601@biblibre.com> Perfect, it's good to know this. You should copy it to a wiki page I think. Regards, Le 22/05/2015 06:11, Robin Sheat a ?crit : > With my package manager hat on, I want to introduce some general > guidelines for adding dependencies to the Koha project, because some > recent approaches have been problematic and sucked up a lot more time > than they should have. > > Apologies in advance for the giant wall of text. It's late afternoon on > a Friday. > > First, the easy case: > * If the dependency you want to add is in wheezy and jessie (being > aware of versions) already, then that's fine. We try not to > introduce these within a monthly release unless there's a good > reason, but for something going into a new major release, that's > totally OK. > > Otherwise: > * Figure out the minimum version that'll work. Don't just add the > latest version because that's what you grabbed out of CPAN. If > it works with a more commonly distributed version then you've > saved many people a lot of time by declaring that (not just me, > but anyone trying to use it on other distributions too.) A bit > more guidance on that here: > http://mail.librecat.org/pipermail/librecat-dev/2015-May/000380.html > * If you can reasonably avoid adding a dependency, do it. It's not > always possible, but some things don't need to be there because > it saves a few minutes of coding. If it saves you hours, then > it's probably reasonable to add it. > * Small, standalone modules will in most cases be easy to deal > with. Things with many complex dependencies will not. The latter > may cause backporting the module to be impossible, in which case > it just won't happen. > * Point it out to me early, not right before it's going to be > released. On one hand, I can tell you then if it's going to be > impossible. On the other, all the testers and QA people will > have access to the dependency if it's already in the repo when > it comes time for signing off, making their lives that much > easier. If I hear that we need a package once it's gone through > everything (and too often it's QA that points this out to me, > that's really bad), your patch _will_ be delayed and may miss a > release. > * Check the copyright. I'm not going to redistribute a module just > because it's in CPAN. As far as I can tell, being in CPAN > doesn't cause a default license to be applied, so if the module > doesn't have something that says that it can be redistributed, > the default position is that it is illegal to redistribute it. > * All modules that I create are submitted into Debian. If they > don't get into Debian, then they don't get into Koha. Debian is > pretty strict, so in turn I have to be pretty strict. The reason > for this is, in part, that it means that the amount of modules I > have to care about won't (hopefully) just keep getting bigger, > there's a chance it'll go down too over time. > * Most modules that are unpackaged have issues that prevent them > going into debian. These are found by running the "lintian" tool > over a package. Usually they're quick and easy. Sometimes there > are a lot of them. If there are a lot of them, I'm going to > delegate the fixing of them to the people who want this module > in. I'm happy to coach you through this process and handle the > basic things, but I don't always have time to spend days > wrangling your dependency into a good state. > * I wrote a guide to help you get started here: > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Building_Debian_Dependencies > * If you don't help out with this when necessary, your > dependency is likely to go to the bottom of my packaging > queue. If you do, it'll probably be near the top :) > * To get a feel for something being easy to package, do: > dh-make-perl --pkg-perl --build --cpan Module::Name > with the lintian config set up from that wiki page. If you get > only a few lintian errors (and some you'll see in every case), > and you get a .deb file out then end, that's a good sign. Even > better if from there you tidy it up, commit it to alioth, and > ask me on the relevant bug to have a look over it for you :) > > There's a fair bit of stuff here, but essentially the purpose boils down > to three points: > 1. my time is limited and some of this is taking away from real > client work that is needed for Catalyst to be able to sponsor me > to do this in the first place, > 2. I don't want to be a bottleneck that slows down your work > getting into Koha, and > 3. the more people that have some experience with this stuff, the > more people can help things get done. > 1. You can also get your name in lights as a contributor to > the Debian project this way. > > I hope you got this far! > > Thanks, > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolin SOMERS Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me fridolin.somers at biblibre.com From dptkvs at gmail.com Wed May 27 08:23:56 2015 From: dptkvs at gmail.com (DP Tripathi) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:53:56 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install Koha 3.20 with Single Command at Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Message-ID: Dear All, Greetings! Now, Install Koha 3.20 with one single command at Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Just follow the instructions. I assume that you have installed Ubuntu 14.04 LTS in your system and it is connected with Internet. Step 1: First download the file at www.librarianguide.co.in/install_koha.sh Step 2: Wherever you keep the file, just give permission with following command. I assume the file is at /home/library root at nitr/home/library# chmod +x install_koha.sh (press enter) root at nitr/home/library# ./install_koha.sh (press enter) It will start installation. Just follow the instruction and provide necessary inputs. Step 3: After installation of everything it will open window with nano editor. Just change the port in Intranet (8000), save (ctrl+x). Now, it will open Firefox automatically with Koha Web Installer. User Name: koha_library Password: Note down the password from (/etc/koha/sites/library/koha-conf.xml) file. The password will be at the bottom of file in section. Enjoy Koha! Thanks, DP Tripathi NIT Rourkela -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com Wed May 27 11:22:37 2015 From: gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com (Gaetan Boisson) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:22:37 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha and mod perl Message-ID: <55658CDD.7080906@biblibre.com> Hello all, has anyone set up mod perl on a koha instance? And if so, are there any bugs or issues doing this? It seems we tried it some time ago, and this page says there are issues, but doesn't give more details: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_Tuning We have been testing it today and i haven't seen serious issues so far. From the wiki it seems the latest tests were made 4 years ago, so it's possible things have changed in Koha and mod_perl. It's something worth trying at any rate, because the mod perl documentation claims "400% to 2000%" performance boosts. It definitely feels *much* faster on our test instance right now. -- Gaetan Boisson Chef de projet biblioth?caire BibLibre 06 52 42 51 29 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Wed May 27 11:32:32 2015 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:32:32 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha and mod perl In-Reply-To: <55658CDD.7080906@biblibre.com> References: <55658CDD.7080906@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <55658F30.7060408@biblibre.com> Le 27/05/2015 11:22, Gaetan Boisson a ?crit : > Hello all, Hello, > has anyone set up mod perl on a koha instance? And if so, are there > any bugs or issues doing this? Theory : Plack & mod_perl are using the same kind of idea to embed Perl (for Plack it's in specific plackup/starman process, for mod_perl it's in Apache itself). The reason why mod_perl was not working well are probably the same reason why Plack was not working well (ie: nested sub & variable scope problem). They have been fixed for supporting Plack, it's not a surprise to me that they fixed the mod_perl problems. It also mean that the performance improvement should also be comparable. Question 1: what could make us face problem with Plack that does not appear on mod_perl ? Question 2: why should we prefer Plack vs mod_perl ? (in the short term and/or in the long term) Question 3: any side effect that we haven't found yet ? > It seems we tried it some time ago, and this page says there are > issues, but doesn't give more details: > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_Tuning > > We have been testing it today and i haven't seen serious issues so > far. From the wiki it seems the latest tests were made 4 years ago, so > it's possible things have changed in Koha and mod_perl. > > It's something worth trying at any rate, because the mod perl > documentation claims "400% to 2000%" performance boosts. It definitely > feels *much* faster on our test instance right now. -- Paul Poulain, Associ?-g?rant / co-owner BibLibre, Services en logiciels libres pour les biblioth?ques BibLibre, Open Source software and services for libraries From julian.fiol at biblibre.com Wed May 27 12:14:03 2015 From: julian.fiol at biblibre.com (Julian FIOL) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 12:14:03 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Improving Plack intranet performances (circulation module) Message-ID: <556598EB.6080601@biblibre.com> Hi everyone, Using Devel::NYTProf on a Plack config, I noticed that when we checkout an item in the circulation page, there is a really long time spent creating the database schema. By adding the import of *Koha::Schema* in the *intranet.psgi* file, we can see a significant improvement of the time spent loading the circulation page. Please find here (in full screen) the proof of what I'm saying. I have also added the manipulations to do into the Plack wiki. Regards, Julian FIOL -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com Wed May 27 12:45:51 2015 From: gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com (Gaetan Boisson) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 12:45:51 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed Message-ID: <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> Hello again all, looking at speed issues there is one thing that i don't understand, and i feel some well versed developpers might have a better idea of what is happening. If you query zebra directly on the server, it's blazingly fast, no matter how big your database and how many results you get. (At least the difference is negligible, and we still get very low response times.) But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 results, it's usualy 4 times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have precise metrics here) than a search that brings up 1 000 000 results. Is it consistent with your experience? If it is, what would be the reason for this? My understanding is that the search code asks zebra for the first n records to display on the first page, and that facets are based on a number of result way below 20 000 anyway, so the total number of results shouldn't really make a difference. -- Gaetan Boisson Chef de projet biblioth?caire BibLibre 06 52 42 51 29 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com From jonathan.druart at biblibre.com Wed May 27 12:56:22 2015 From: jonathan.druart at biblibre.com (Jonathan Druart) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:56:22 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed In-Reply-To: <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> References: <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> Message-ID: Gaetan, have a look at the metrics on bug 13665. 2015-05-27 11:45 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Boisson : > Hello again all, > > looking at speed issues there is one thing that i don't understand, and i > feel some well versed developpers might have a better idea of what is > happening. > > If you query zebra directly on the server, it's blazingly fast, no matter > how big your database and how many results you get. (At least the difference > is negligible, and we still get very low response times.) > > But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 results, it's usualy 4 > times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have precise metrics here) than a > search that brings up 1 000 000 results. > > Is it consistent with your experience? > > If it is, what would be the reason for this? My understanding is that the > search code asks zebra for the first n records to display on the first page, > and that facets are based on a number of result way below 20 000 anyway, so > the total number of results shouldn't really make a difference. > > -- > Gaetan Boisson > Chef de projet biblioth?caire > BibLibre > 06 52 42 51 29 > 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille > gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ From mtompset at hotmail.com Wed May 27 13:57:32 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 07:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install Koha 3.20 with Single Command at Ubuntu 14.04LTS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Greetings, It is always better to follow the instructions on the wiki, as they are always more current (patches take longer to get into master). For example, in your script you have the old MySQL security tweak, but it is commented out. The new tweak: sudo mysql_secure_installation I do not recommend using a single step install script. This makes it more difficult to help you fix your problems when something goes wrong. Primary reference: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_on_Debian Secondary reference (in the case of Ubuntu): http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_on_ubuntu_-_packages GPML, Mark Tompsett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com Wed May 27 20:29:36 2015 From: gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com (Gaetan Boisson) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 20:29:36 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed In-Reply-To: References: <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <55660D10.9020600@biblibre.com> Well as i said, the time is not the same depending on the number of results, but in both cases, the number of results is anyway much higher than the number of records taken into consideration for facets. Your investigation indicates that: In ZOOM->record, the time is spent in my $_rec = Net::Z3950::ZOOM::resultset_record($this->_rs(), $which); Maybe it's worth having a deeper look in this. Le 27/05/2015 12:56, Jonathan Druart a ?crit : > Gaetan, > have a look at the metrics on bug 13665. > > 2015-05-27 11:45 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Boisson : >> Hello again all, >> >> looking at speed issues there is one thing that i don't understand, and i >> feel some well versed developpers might have a better idea of what is >> happening. >> >> If you query zebra directly on the server, it's blazingly fast, no matter >> how big your database and how many results you get. (At least the difference >> is negligible, and we still get very low response times.) >> >> But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 results, it's usualy 4 >> times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have precise metrics here) than a >> search that brings up 1 000 000 results. >> >> Is it consistent with your experience? >> >> If it is, what would be the reason for this? My understanding is that the >> search code asks zebra for the first n records to display on the first page, >> and that facets are based on a number of result way below 20 000 anyway, so >> the total number of results shouldn't really make a difference. >> >> -- >> Gaetan Boisson >> Chef de projet biblioth?caire >> BibLibre >> 06 52 42 51 29 >> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Gaetan Boisson Chef de projet biblioth?caire BibLibre 06 52 42 51 29 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com From paul.a at navalmarinearchive.com Wed May 27 21:02:20 2015 From: paul.a at navalmarinearchive.com (Paul A) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed In-Reply-To: <55660D10.9020600@biblibre.com> References: <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20150527145630.03e3c988@pop.navalmarinearchive.com> At 08:29 PM 5/27/2015 +0200, Gaetan Boisson wrote: >Well as i said, the time is not the same depending on the number of >results, but in both cases, the number of results is anyway much higher >than the number of records taken into consideration for facets. > >Your investigation indicates that: > >In ZOOM->record, the time is spent in > my $_rec = Net::Z3950::ZOOM::resultset_record($this->_rs(), $which); > >Maybe it's worth having a deeper look in this. I looked into this to some extent in January this year; facets in 3.18 appeared to be a limiting factor as it "swamped" one CPU core (and NYProf showed this to be from ZOOM - see Regards -- Paul >Le 27/05/2015 12:56, Jonathan Druart a ??crit : >>Gaetan, >>have a look at the metrics on bug 13665. >> >>2015-05-27 11:45 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Boisson : >>> Hello again all, >>> >>>looking at speed issues there is one thing that i don't understand, and i >>>feel some well versed developpers might have a better idea of what is >>>happening. >>> >>>If you query zebra directly on the server, it's blazingly fast, no matter >>>how big your database and how many results you get. (At least the difference >>>is negligible, and we still get very low response times.) >>> >>>But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 results, it's usualy 4 >>>times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have precise metrics here) than a >>>search that brings up 1 000 000 results. >>> >>>Is it consistent with your experience? >>> >>>If it is, what would be the reason for this? My understanding is that the >>>search code asks zebra for the first n records to display on the first page, >>>and that facets are based on a number of result way below 20 000 anyway, so >>>the total number of results shouldn't really make a difference. >>> >>>-- >>>Gaetan Boisson >>>Chef de projet biblioth??caire >>>BibLibre >>>06 52 42 51 29 >>>108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >>>gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Koha-devel mailing list >>>Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > >-- >Gaetan Boisson >Chef de projet biblioth??caire >BibLibre >06 52 42 51 29 >108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com > >_______________________________________________ >Koha-devel mailing list >Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > --- Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation, research and education through the written word and the arts. and From robin at catalyst.net.nz Thu May 28 01:46:54 2015 From: robin at catalyst.net.nz (Robin Sheat) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:46:54 +1200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install Koha 3.20 with Single Command at Ubuntu 14.04 LTS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1432770414.25145.113.camel@catalyst.net.nz> DP Tripathi schreef op wo 27-05-2015 om 11:53 [+0530]: > Just follow the instructions. Some pretty minor issues to start with: Why does it do this: sed -e 's/ident//; s/sameuser/trust/' /etc/apache2/ports.conf.dpt > /etc/apache2/ports.conf then: sed -e 's/ident//; s/sameuser/trust/' /etc/mysql/my.cnf.dpt > /etc/mysql/my.cnf then: sed -e 's/ident//; s/sameuser/trust/' /etc/perl/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini.dpt > /etc/perl/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini ? also, rewriting the ParserDetails.ini hasn't been needed for a long time. The code does stuff on port 8000, but the messages talk about port 8080. I think in general 8080 is the more common port to set up secondary webservices on. The last echo writes and then immediately opens an editor to the file, so you wouldn't know what you need to do with it. If it did show the message, it would ask them to change the port, and then open firefox, assuming that it hadn't been changed. Also, if they did change it, it now wouldn't match the "Listen" line added near the top. This looks like a reasonable quick-start to get a Koha server up, though. It won't give you nice things like name-based addressing that you'd probably want in a production server, but they'd be easy enough to add on after the fact. -- Robin Sheat Catalyst IT Ltd. ? +64 4 803 2204 GPG: 5FA7 4B49 1E4D CAA4 4C38 8505 77F5 B724 F871 3BDF -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From robin at catalyst.net.nz Thu May 28 02:01:12 2015 From: robin at catalyst.net.nz (Robin Sheat) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:01:12 +1200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Improving Plack intranet performances (circulation module) In-Reply-To: <556598EB.6080601@biblibre.com> References: <556598EB.6080601@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <1432771272.25145.119.camel@catalyst.net.nz> Julian FIOL schreef op wo 27-05-2015 om 12:14 [+0200]: > By adding the import of Koha::Schema in the intranet.psgi file, we can > see a significant improvement of the time spent loading the > circulation page. Somewhere on a giant TODO-unless-someone-does-it-first list I have in my head is a plan to make packages that use plack instead of CGI. Probably a package you can install alongside Koha and it converts all the files to support plack (Debian has a handy thing that lets you redirect files that'd make this a lot easier - install the package and it's plack, remove the package and it's back to normal.) This is totally the sort of thing that's really good to know as part of implementing that, so all sorts of things like this that you find, please wiki-fy :) Also, Devel::NYTProf is great for this stuff. -- Robin Sheat Catalyst IT Ltd. ? +64 4 803 2204 GPG: 5FA7 4B49 1E4D CAA4 4C38 8505 77F5 B724 F871 3BDF -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fridolin.somers at biblibre.com Thu May 28 09:05:43 2015 From: fridolin.somers at biblibre.com (Fridolin SOMERS) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:05:43 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install Koha 3.20 with Single Command at Ubuntu 14.04 LTS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5566BE47.8090204@biblibre.com> Hie, Looks greate. But why forcing apache MPM Prefork since koha-common has apache2-mpm-itk has dependancy ? PS : installing nano will feed the troll ;) Le 27/05/2015 08:23, DP Tripathi a ?crit : > Dear All, > > Greetings! > > Now, Install Koha 3.20 with one single command at Ubuntu 14.04 LTS > > Just follow the instructions. > > I assume that you have installed Ubuntu 14.04 LTS in your system and it is > connected with Internet. > > Step 1: First download the file at www.librarianguide.co.in/install_koha.sh > > Step 2: Wherever you keep the file, just give permission with following > command. > > I assume the file is at /home/library > > root at nitr/home/library# chmod +x install_koha.sh (press enter) > > root at nitr/home/library# ./install_koha.sh (press enter) > > It will start installation. Just follow the instruction and provide > necessary inputs. > > Step 3: After installation of everything it will open window with nano > editor. Just change the port in Intranet (8000), save (ctrl+x). > > Now, it will open Firefox automatically with Koha Web Installer. > > User Name: koha_library > > Password: Note down the password from > (/etc/koha/sites/library/koha-conf.xml) file. > > The password will be at the bottom of file in section. > > Enjoy Koha! > > Thanks, > > DP Tripathi > NIT Rourkela > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolin SOMERS Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me fridolin.somers at biblibre.com From fridolin.somers at biblibre.com Thu May 28 09:43:40 2015 From: fridolin.somers at biblibre.com (Fridolin SOMERS) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:43:40 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20150527145630.03e3c988@pop.navalmarinearchive.com> References: <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> <5.2.1.1.2.20150527145630.03e3c988@pop.navalmarinearchive.com> Message-ID: <5566C72C.3010900@biblibre.com> Could this mean one should not get records from Zebra but directly from database ? If getting the id of search results without getting the full record is possible. Le 27/05/2015 21:02, Paul A a ?crit : > At 08:29 PM 5/27/2015 +0200, Gaetan Boisson wrote: >> Well as i said, the time is not the same depending on the number of >> results, but in both cases, the number of results is anyway much >> higher than the number of records taken into consideration for facets. >> >> Your investigation indicates that: >> >> In ZOOM->record, the time is spent in >> my $_rec = Net::Z3950::ZOOM::resultset_record($this->_rs(), $which); >> >> Maybe it's worth having a deeper look in this. > > I looked into this to some extent in January this year; facets in 3.18 > appeared > to be a limiting factor as it "swamped" one CPU core (and NYProf showed > this to be from ZOOM - see > > > Regards -- Paul > > >> Le 27/05/2015 12:56, Jonathan Druart a ??crit : >>> Gaetan, >>> have a look at the metrics on bug 13665. >>> >>> 2015-05-27 11:45 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Boisson : >>>> Hello again all, >>>> >>>> looking at speed issues there is one thing that i don't understand, >>>> and i >>>> feel some well versed developpers might have a better idea of what is >>>> happening. >>>> >>>> If you query zebra directly on the server, it's blazingly fast, no >>>> matter >>>> how big your database and how many results you get. (At least the >>>> difference >>>> is negligible, and we still get very low response times.) >>>> >>>> But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 results, it's >>>> usualy 4 >>>> times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have precise metrics here) >>>> than a >>>> search that brings up 1 000 000 results. >>>> >>>> Is it consistent with your experience? >>>> >>>> If it is, what would be the reason for this? My understanding is >>>> that the >>>> search code asks zebra for the first n records to display on the >>>> first page, >>>> and that facets are based on a number of result way below 20 000 >>>> anyway, so >>>> the total number of results shouldn't really make a difference. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Gaetan Boisson >>>> Chef de projet biblioth??caire >>>> BibLibre >>>> 06 52 42 51 29 >>>> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >>>> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Koha-devel mailing list >>>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> >> -- >> Gaetan Boisson >> Chef de projet biblioth??caire >> BibLibre >> 06 52 42 51 29 >> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > > --- > Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation, > research and education through the written word and the arts. > and > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Fridolin SOMERS Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me fridolin.somers at biblibre.com From tomascohen at gmail.com Thu May 28 12:52:07 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 07:52:07 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed In-Reply-To: <5566C72C.3010900@biblibre.com> References: <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> <5.2.1.1.2.20150527145630.03e3c988@pop.navalmarinearchive.com> <5566C72C.3010900@biblibre.com> Message-ID: El 28/5/2015 4:43 a. m., "Fridolin SOMERS" escribi?: > > Could this mean one should not get records from Zebra but directly from database ? If getting the id of search results without getting the full record is possible. It is possible. But we should evaluate the trade-off from preparing the record for display too. Because for indexing we do lots of stuff to the record, stuff that should be done on rendering time with such a change. > > Le 27/05/2015 21:02, Paul A a ?crit : >> >> At 08:29 PM 5/27/2015 +0200, Gaetan Boisson wrote: >>> >>> Well as i said, the time is not the same depending on the number of >>> results, but in both cases, the number of results is anyway much >>> higher than the number of records taken into consideration for facets. >>> >>> Your investigation indicates that: >>> >>> In ZOOM->record, the time is spent in >>> my $_rec = Net::Z3950::ZOOM::resultset_record($this->_rs(), $which); >>> >>> Maybe it's worth having a deeper look in this. >> >> >> I looked into this to some extent in January this year; facets in 3.18 >> appeared >> to be a limiting factor as it "swamped" one CPU core (and NYProf showed >> this to be from ZOOM - see >> >> >> Regards -- Paul >> >> >>> Le 27/05/2015 12:56, Jonathan Druart a ??crit : >>>> >>>> Gaetan, >>>> have a look at the metrics on bug 13665. >>>> >>>> 2015-05-27 11:45 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Boisson : >>>>> >>>>> Hello again all, >>>>> >>>>> looking at speed issues there is one thing that i don't understand, >>>>> and i >>>>> feel some well versed developpers might have a better idea of what is >>>>> happening. >>>>> >>>>> If you query zebra directly on the server, it's blazingly fast, no >>>>> matter >>>>> how big your database and how many results you get. (At least the >>>>> difference >>>>> is negligible, and we still get very low response times.) >>>>> >>>>> But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 results, it's >>>>> usualy 4 >>>>> times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have precise metrics here) >>>>> than a >>>>> search that brings up 1 000 000 results. >>>>> >>>>> Is it consistent with your experience? >>>>> >>>>> If it is, what would be the reason for this? My understanding is >>>>> that the >>>>> search code asks zebra for the first n records to display on the >>>>> first page, >>>>> and that facets are based on a number of result way below 20 000 >>>>> anyway, so >>>>> the total number of results shouldn't really make a difference. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Gaetan Boisson >>>>> Chef de projet biblioth??caire >>>>> BibLibre >>>>> 06 52 42 51 29 >>>>> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >>>>> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Koha-devel mailing list >>>>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Gaetan Boisson >>> Chef de projet biblioth??caire >>> BibLibre >>> 06 52 42 51 29 >>> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >>> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Koha-devel mailing list >>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>> >> >> --- >> Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation, >> research and education through the written word and the arts. >> and >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > > -- > Fridolin SOMERS > Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me > fridolin.somers at biblibre.com > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul.a at navalmarinearchive.com Thu May 28 15:54:51 2015 From: paul.a at navalmarinearchive.com (Paul A) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed In-Reply-To: References: <5566C72C.3010900@biblibre.com> <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> <5.2.1.1.2.20150527145630.03e3c988@pop.navalmarinearchive.com> <5566C72C.3010900@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20150528094244.02578240@pop.navalmarinearchive.com> At 07:52 AM 5/28/2015 -0300, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote: >El 28/5/2015 4:43 a. m., "Fridolin SOMERS" >escribi??: > > > > Could this mean one should not get records from Zebra but directly from > database ? If getting the id of search results without getting the full > record is possible. > >It is possible. But we should evaluate the trade-off from preparing the >record for display too. Because for indexing we do lots of stuff to the >record, stuff that should be done on rendering time with such a change. Interesting. The rendering is only on 20 records, while the search is on tens or hundreds of thousands of records. It would obviously be a major exercise, but the trade-off would be enormous *if* it avoids the overload on the single core of the CPU (multi-threading across cores is, from what I was able to found out, just an impossible dream.) Facets are a search enhancement with enormous potential, but when the time required increases from a few tenths of a second to 20 seconds+, we felt we could not put it into production -- our users tend to want "instant gratification." Best -- Paul > > > > Le 27/05/2015 21:02, Paul A a ??crit : > >> > >> At 08:29 PM 5/27/2015 +0200, Gaetan Boisson wrote: > >>> > >>> Well as i said, the time is not the same depending on the number of > >>> results, but in both cases, the number of results is anyway much > >>> higher than the number of records taken into consideration for facets. > >>> > >>> Your investigation indicates that: > >>> > >>> In ZOOM->record, the time is spent in > >>> ? my $_rec = Net::Z3950::ZOOM::resultset_record($this->_rs(), $which); > >>> > >>> Maybe it's worth having a deeper look in this. > >> > >> > >> I looked into this to some extent in January this year; facets in 3.18 > >> appeared > >> to be a limiting factor as it "swamped" one CPU core (and NYProf showed > >> this to be from ZOOM - see > >> > >> > >> Regards -- Paul > >> > >> > >>> Le 27/05/2015 12:56, Jonathan Druart a ????crit : > >>>> > >>>> Gaetan, > >>>> have a look at the metrics on bug 13665. > >>>> > >>>> 2015-05-27 11:45 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Boisson : > >>>>> > >>>>> ? Hello again all, > >>>>> > >>>>> looking at speed issues there is one thing that i don't understand, > >>>>> and i > >>>>> feel some well versed developpers might have a better idea of what is > >>>>> happening. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you query zebra directly on the server, it's blazingly fast, no > >>>>> matter > >>>>> how big your database and how many results you get. (At least the > >>>>> difference > >>>>> is negligible, and we still get very low response times.) > >>>>> > >>>>> But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 results, it's > >>>>> usualy 4 > >>>>> times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have precise metrics here) > >>>>> than a > >>>>> search that brings up 1 000 000 results. > >>>>> > >>>>> Is it consistent with your experience? > >>>>> > >>>>> If it is, what would be the reason for this? My understanding is > >>>>> that the > >>>>> search code asks zebra for the first n records to display on the > >>>>> first page, > >>>>> and that facets are based on a number of result way below 20 000 > >>>>> anyway, so > >>>>> the total number of results shouldn't really make a difference. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Gaetan Boisson > >>>>> Chef de projet biblioth????caire > >>>>> BibLibre > >>>>> 06 52 42 51 29 > >>>>> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille > >>>>> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com From tomascohen at gmail.com Thu May 28 16:18:22 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:18:22 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Call for Dev Meeting June 3 Message-ID: Hi everyone, starting the 3.22 cycle i'd like to keep a 3-week frecquency for dev meetings. Lots of big stuff is being worked by different people/teams so having a regular/deterministic schedule for the meetings might be handy to keep communicated. Next meeting will be held next wednestady, with the already used two-session schema. The agenda will look short at first sight, but we all know it is not :-D http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Development_IRC_meeting_3_June_2015 =Short= Day: June 3 2015 Time: - Part 1: 15:00 UTC - Part 1: 22:00 UTC All comments are welcome. -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtompset at hotmail.com Thu May 28 16:31:41 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] getFrameworkLanguages Message-ID: Greetings, Indranil Das Gupta found this painful to see typo in getFrameworkLanguages: 'native_descrition'=>$language_set->{language_native_description}. I told him, tweaking C4/Languages requires writing a test (good rule of thumb). So, I wake up, and discover no tests were yet written, and I was itching for a sign off. So, I attempt and discover the hole is deeper than initially thought. In fact, Indranil Das Gupta pointed out to me that it doesn't seem to be used anywhere. mtompset at debian:~/kohaclone$ git grep getFrameworkLanguages C4/Languages.pm: memoize_memcached('getFrameworkLanguages' , memcached => C4::Context->memcached); Part of an export -- C4/Languages.pm: &getFrameworkLanguages More exporting -- C4/Languages.pm: @EXPORT_OK = qw(getFrameworkLanguages getTranslatedLanguages getAllLanguages getLanguages get_bidi regex_lang_subtags language_get_description accept_language getlanguage); POD stuff -- C4/Languages.pm:=head2 getFrameworkLanguages POD stuff example -- C4/Languages.pm: my $languages = getFrameworkLanguages(); Actual function head -- C4/Languages.pm:sub getFrameworkLanguages { As you can tell I didn't comment on one piece: that memoize_memcached line. Is there another thing to trace to figure out if it is used in the memoize logic somewhere, or is it safe to remove this function? Feedback appreciated. What bug 14284 becomes is dependent on feedback. http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14284 GPML, Mark Tompsett From tomascohen at gmail.com Thu May 28 16:35:51 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:35:51 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] getFrameworkLanguages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We have dead code in lots of places. A cleanup is not a bad idea, but we should be careful with API changes because someone could be using it. I didn't spend time on looking at the code. We can add it to the agentda for the meeting. 2015-05-28 11:31 GMT-03:00 Mark Tompsett : > Greetings, > > Indranil Das Gupta found this painful to see typo in > getFrameworkLanguages: > 'native_descrition'=>$language_set->{language_native_description}. > I told him, tweaking C4/Languages requires writing a test (good rule of > thumb). So, I wake up, and discover no tests were yet written, and I was > itching for a sign off. So, I attempt and discover the hole is deeper than > initially thought. In fact, Indranil Das Gupta pointed out to me that it > doesn't seem to be used anywhere. > > mtompset at debian:~/kohaclone$ git grep getFrameworkLanguages > C4/Languages.pm: memoize_memcached('getFrameworkLanguages' , > memcached => C4::Context->memcached); > > Part of an export -- > C4/Languages.pm: &getFrameworkLanguages > > More exporting -- > C4/Languages.pm: @EXPORT_OK = qw(getFrameworkLanguages > getTranslatedLanguages getAllLanguages getLanguages get_bidi > regex_lang_subtags language_get_description accept_language getlanguage); > > POD stuff -- > C4/Languages.pm:=head2 getFrameworkLanguages > > POD stuff example -- > C4/Languages.pm: my $languages = getFrameworkLanguages(); > > Actual function head -- > C4/Languages.pm:sub getFrameworkLanguages { > > > As you can tell I didn't comment on one piece: that memoize_memcached > line. Is there another thing to trace to figure out if it is used in the > memoize logic somewhere, or is it safe to remove this function? Feedback > appreciated. > > What bug 14284 becomes is dependent on feedback. > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14284 > > GPML, > Mark Tompsett > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtompset at hotmail.com Thu May 28 16:46:12 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] getFrameworkLanguages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Greetings, Shortly after I posted my note, I noticed bug 12017. It removes it. I think we may have a duplicate. Sorry, Indranil Das Gupta. GPML, Mark Tompsett From: Tomas Cohen Arazi Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:35 AM To: Mark Tompsett Cc: koha-devel Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] getFrameworkLanguages We have dead code in lots of places. A cleanup is not a bad idea, but we should be careful with API changes because someone could be using it. I didn't spend time on looking at the code. We can add it to the agentda for the meeting. 2015-05-28 11:31 GMT-03:00 Mark Tompsett : Greetings, Indranil Das Gupta found this painful to see typo in getFrameworkLanguages: 'native_descrition'=>$language_set->{language_native_description}. I told him, tweaking C4/Languages requires writing a test (good rule of thumb). So, I wake up, and discover no tests were yet written, and I was itching for a sign off. So, I attempt and discover the hole is deeper than initially thought. In fact, Indranil Das Gupta pointed out to me that it doesn't seem to be used anywhere. mtompset at debian:~/kohaclone$ git grep getFrameworkLanguages C4/Languages.pm: memoize_memcached('getFrameworkLanguages' , memcached => C4::Context->memcached); Part of an export -- C4/Languages.pm: &getFrameworkLanguages More exporting -- C4/Languages.pm: @EXPORT_OK = qw(getFrameworkLanguages getTranslatedLanguages getAllLanguages getLanguages get_bidi regex_lang_subtags language_get_description accept_language getlanguage); POD stuff -- C4/Languages.pm:=head2 getFrameworkLanguages POD stuff example -- C4/Languages.pm: my $languages = getFrameworkLanguages(); Actual function head -- C4/Languages.pm:sub getFrameworkLanguages { As you can tell I didn't comment on one piece: that memoize_memcached line. Is there another thing to trace to figure out if it is used in the memoize logic somewhere, or is it safe to remove this function? Feedback appreciated. What bug 14284 becomes is dependent on feedback. http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14284 GPML, Mark Tompsett _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wlEmoticon-smile[1].png Type: image/png Size: 1046 bytes Desc: not available URL: From julian.fiol at biblibre.com Thu May 28 16:48:41 2015 From: julian.fiol at biblibre.com (Julian FIOL) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 16:48:41 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] getFrameworkLanguages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <55672AC9.7010205@biblibre.com> Hi, Bernardo Gonzales Kriegel made a lot of work with bug 12017 around this, and clean up getFrameworkLanguages and other useless things. It also move the language_description table out of database, and put it in templates. This is really interesting concerning traduction and performances ! Regards, Julian FIOL On 28/05/2015 16:31, Mark Tompsett wrote: > Greetings, > > Indranil Das Gupta found this painful to see typo in > getFrameworkLanguages: > 'native_descrition'=>$language_set->{language_native_description}. > I told him, tweaking C4/Languages requires writing a test (good rule > of thumb). So, I wake up, and discover no tests were yet written, and > I was itching for a sign off. So, I attempt and discover the hole is > deeper than initially thought. In fact, Indranil Das Gupta pointed out > to me that it doesn't seem to be used anywhere. > > mtompset at debian:~/kohaclone$ git grep getFrameworkLanguages > C4/Languages.pm: memoize_memcached('getFrameworkLanguages' , > memcached => C4::Context->memcached); > > Part of an export -- > C4/Languages.pm: &getFrameworkLanguages > > More exporting -- > C4/Languages.pm: @EXPORT_OK = qw(getFrameworkLanguages > getTranslatedLanguages getAllLanguages getLanguages get_bidi > regex_lang_subtags language_get_description accept_language getlanguage); > > POD stuff -- > C4/Languages.pm:=head2 getFrameworkLanguages > > POD stuff example -- > C4/Languages.pm: my $languages = getFrameworkLanguages(); > > Actual function head -- > C4/Languages.pm:sub getFrameworkLanguages { > > > As you can tell I didn't comment on one piece: that memoize_memcached > line. Is there another thing to trace to figure out if it is used in > the memoize logic somewhere, or is it safe to remove this function? > Feedback appreciated. > > What bug 14284 becomes is dependent on feedback. > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14284 > > GPML, > Mark Tompsett > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From barton at bywatersolutions.com Thu May 28 17:08:39 2015 From: barton at bywatersolutions.com (Barton Chittenden) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] getFrameworkLanguages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I mentioned this in #koha a few weeks ago, but this seems like a perfect place to bring it up again: http://devblog.nestoria.com/post/115930183873/tombstones-for-dead-code Essentially, this is a method for adding executable markers near code that you want to remove. If you look for the results of the markers, and never find them, you know that the code has never been called, and is safe to remove (watch the video for discussion of a few subtle points) --Barton On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote: > We have dead code in lots of places. A cleanup is not a bad idea, but we > should be careful with API changes because someone could be using it. I > didn't spend time on looking at the code. We can add it to the agentda for > the meeting. > > 2015-05-28 11:31 GMT-03:00 Mark Tompsett : > > Greetings, >> >> Indranil Das Gupta found this painful to see typo in >> getFrameworkLanguages: >> 'native_descrition'=>$language_set->{language_native_description}. >> I told him, tweaking C4/Languages requires writing a test (good rule of >> thumb). So, I wake up, and discover no tests were yet written, and I was >> itching for a sign off. So, I attempt and discover the hole is deeper than >> initially thought. In fact, Indranil Das Gupta pointed out to me that it >> doesn't seem to be used anywhere. >> >> mtompset at debian:~/kohaclone$ git grep getFrameworkLanguages >> C4/Languages.pm: memoize_memcached('getFrameworkLanguages' , >> memcached => C4::Context->memcached); >> >> Part of an export -- >> C4/Languages.pm: &getFrameworkLanguages >> >> More exporting -- >> C4/Languages.pm: @EXPORT_OK = qw(getFrameworkLanguages >> getTranslatedLanguages getAllLanguages getLanguages get_bidi >> regex_lang_subtags language_get_description accept_language getlanguage); >> >> POD stuff -- >> C4/Languages.pm:=head2 getFrameworkLanguages >> >> POD stuff example -- >> C4/Languages.pm: my $languages = getFrameworkLanguages(); >> >> Actual function head -- >> C4/Languages.pm:sub getFrameworkLanguages { >> >> >> As you can tell I didn't comment on one piece: that memoize_memcached >> line. Is there another thing to trace to figure out if it is used in the >> memoize logic somewhere, or is it safe to remove this function? Feedback >> appreciated. >> >> What bug 14284 becomes is dependent on feedback. >> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14284 >> >> GPML, >> Mark Tompsett >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > > > > -- > Tom?s Cohen Arazi > Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica > Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba > ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 > GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fridolin.somers at biblibre.com Thu May 28 17:21:15 2015 From: fridolin.somers at biblibre.com (Fridolin SOMERS) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:21:15 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Improving Plack intranet performances (circulation module) In-Reply-To: <556598EB.6080601@biblibre.com> References: <556598EB.6080601@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <5567326B.30106@biblibre.com> Very good news, thanks Le 27/05/2015 12:14, Julian FIOL a ?crit : > Hi everyone, > > Using Devel::NYTProf on a Plack config, I noticed that when we checkout > an item in the circulation page, there is a really long time spent > creating the database schema. > > By adding the import of *Koha::Schema* in the *intranet.psgi* file, we > can see a significant improvement of the time spent loading the > circulation page. > > Please find here > > (in full screen) the proof of what I'm saying. > > I have also added the manipulations to do into the Plack > > wiki. > > Regards, > Julian FIOL > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolin SOMERS Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me fridolin.somers at biblibre.com From tomascohen at gmail.com Thu May 28 17:22:39 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:22:39 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Improving Plack intranet performances (circulation module) In-Reply-To: <5567326B.30106@biblibre.com> References: <556598EB.6080601@biblibre.com> <5567326B.30106@biblibre.com> Message-ID: I resumed my work on automating plack usage on packages installs. News about it soon. 2015-05-28 12:21 GMT-03:00 Fridolin SOMERS : > Very good news, thanks > > Le 27/05/2015 12:14, Julian FIOL a ?crit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Using Devel::NYTProf on a Plack config, I noticed that when we checkout >> an item in the circulation page, there is a really long time spent >> creating the database schema. >> >> By adding the import of *Koha::Schema* in the *intranet.psgi* file, we >> can see a significant improvement of the time spent loading the >> circulation page. >> >> Please find here >> < >> http://www.slideshare.net/JulianFiol/koha-circulation-checkout-improvement >> > >> (in full screen) the proof of what I'm saying. >> >> I have also added the manipulations to do into the Plack >> >> wiki. >> >> Regards, >> Julian FIOL >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> >> > -- > Fridolin SOMERS > Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me > fridolin.somers at biblibre.com > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fridolin.somers at biblibre.com Thu May 28 17:23:51 2015 From: fridolin.somers at biblibre.com (Fridolin SOMERS) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:23:51 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed In-Reply-To: References: <5565A05F.70809@biblibre.com> <5.2.1.1.2.20150527145630.03e3c988@pop.navalmarinearchive.com> <5566C72C.3010900@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <55673307.1090104@biblibre.com> Le 28/05/2015 12:52, Tomas Cohen Arazi a ?crit : > El 28/5/2015 4:43 a. m., "Fridolin SOMERS" > escribi?: >> >> Could this mean one should not get records from Zebra but directly from > database ? If getting the id of search results without getting the full > record is possible. > > It is possible. But we should evaluate the trade-off from preparing the > record for display too. Because for indexing we do lots of stuff to the > record, stuff that should be done on rendering time with such a change. What changes ? For detail page, the record comes from database so it should not be different for search results page. > >> >> Le 27/05/2015 21:02, Paul A a ?crit : >>> >>> At 08:29 PM 5/27/2015 +0200, Gaetan Boisson wrote: >>>> >>>> Well as i said, the time is not the same depending on the number of >>>> results, but in both cases, the number of results is anyway much >>>> higher than the number of records taken into consideration for facets. >>>> >>>> Your investigation indicates that: >>>> >>>> In ZOOM->record, the time is spent in >>>> my $_rec = Net::Z3950::ZOOM::resultset_record($this->_rs(), $which); >>>> >>>> Maybe it's worth having a deeper look in this. >>> >>> >>> I looked into this to some extent in January this year; facets in 3.18 >>> appeared >>> to be a limiting factor as it "swamped" one CPU core (and NYProf showed >>> this to be from ZOOM - see >>> >>> >>> Regards -- Paul >>> >>> >>>> Le 27/05/2015 12:56, Jonathan Druart a ??crit : >>>>> >>>>> Gaetan, >>>>> have a look at the metrics on bug 13665. >>>>> >>>>> 2015-05-27 11:45 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Boisson > : >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello again all, >>>>>> >>>>>> looking at speed issues there is one thing that i don't understand, >>>>>> and i >>>>>> feel some well versed developpers might have a better idea of what is >>>>>> happening. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you query zebra directly on the server, it's blazingly fast, no >>>>>> matter >>>>>> how big your database and how many results you get. (At least the >>>>>> difference >>>>>> is negligible, and we still get very low response times.) >>>>>> >>>>>> But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 results, it's >>>>>> usualy 4 >>>>>> times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have precise metrics here) >>>>>> than a >>>>>> search that brings up 1 000 000 results. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it consistent with your experience? >>>>>> >>>>>> If it is, what would be the reason for this? My understanding is >>>>>> that the >>>>>> search code asks zebra for the first n records to display on the >>>>>> first page, >>>>>> and that facets are based on a number of result way below 20 000 >>>>>> anyway, so >>>>>> the total number of results shouldn't really make a difference. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Gaetan Boisson >>>>>> Chef de projet biblioth??caire >>>>>> BibLibre >>>>>> 06 52 42 51 29 >>>>>> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >>>>>> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Koha-devel mailing list >>>>>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>>>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>>>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>>>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>>>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Gaetan Boisson >>>> Chef de projet biblioth??caire >>>> BibLibre >>>> 06 52 42 51 29 >>>> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >>>> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Koha-devel mailing list >>>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>>> >>> >>> --- >>> Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation, >>> research and education through the written word and the arts. >>> and >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Koha-devel mailing list >>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> >> >> -- >> Fridolin SOMERS >> Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me >> fridolin.somers at biblibre.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolin SOMERS Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me fridolin.somers at biblibre.com From veron at veron.ch Thu May 28 19:23:48 2015 From: veron at veron.ch (=?windows-1252?Q?Marc_V=E9ron?=) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:23:48 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] getFrameworkLanguages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <55674F24.5080408@veron.ch> That is really a great idea! --Marc Am 28.05.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Barton Chittenden: > I mentioned this in #koha a few weeks ago, but this seems like a perfect > place to bring it up again: > > http://devblog.nestoria.com/post/115930183873/tombstones-for-dead-code > > Essentially, this is a method for adding executable markers near code > that you want to remove. If you look for the results of the markers, and > never find them, you know that the code has never been called, and is > safe to remove (watch the video for discussion of a few subtle points) > > --Barton > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Tomas Cohen Arazi > > wrote: > > We have dead code in lots of places. A cleanup is not a bad idea, > but we should be careful with API changes because someone could be > using it. I didn't spend time on looking at the code. We can add it > to the agentda for the meeting. > (...) From long_sam.tw at yahoo.com.tw Fri May 29 04:58:26 2015 From: long_sam.tw at yahoo.com.tw (long_sam.tw) Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 02:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Koha-devel] search speed In-Reply-To: <55673307.1090104@biblibre.com> References: <55673307.1090104@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <562141696.297352.1432868306818.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Dear Fridolin, I see C4/Context.pm dbh no mysql_use_result options, We can try it. but it maybe modify koha SQL statement. http://search.cpan.org/~capttofu/DBD-mysql-4.011/lib/DBD/mysql.pm This attribute forces the driver to use mysql_use_result rather than mysql_store_result. The former is faster and less memory consuming, but tends to block other processes. (That's why mysql_store_result is the default.) BR. ??, > Fridolin SOMERS ? 2015/5/28 (??) 11:24 PM ??? > > > > Le 28/05/2015 12:52, Tomas Cohen Arazi a ?crit : >> El 28/5/2015 4:43 a. m., "Fridolin SOMERS" > >> escribi?: >>> >>> Could this mean one should not get records from Zebra but directly from >> database ? If getting the id of search results without getting the full >> record is possible. >> >> It is possible. But we should evaluate the trade-off from preparing the >> record for display too. Because for indexing we do lots of stuff to the >> record, stuff that should be done on rendering time with such a change. > What changes ? > For detail page, the record comes from database so it should not be > different for search results page. > >> >>> >>> Le 27/05/2015 21:02, Paul A a ?crit : >>>> >>>> At 08:29 PM 5/27/2015 +0200, Gaetan Boisson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well as i said, the time is not the same depending on the > number of >>>>> results, but in both cases, the number of results is anyway > much >>>>> higher than the number of records taken into consideration for > facets. >>>>> >>>>> Your investigation indicates that: >>>>> >>>>> In ZOOM->record, the time is spent in >>>>> my $_rec = > Net::Z3950::ZOOM::resultset_record($this->_rs(), $which); >>>>> >>>>> Maybe it's worth having a deeper look in this. >>>> >>>> >>>> I looked into this to some extent in January this year; facets in > 3.18 >>>> > appeared >>>> to be a limiting factor as it "swamped" one CPU core (and > NYProf showed >>>> this to be from ZOOM - see >>>> > >>>> >>>> Regards -- Paul >>>> >>>> >>>>> Le 27/05/2015 12:56, Jonathan Druart a ??crit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Gaetan, >>>>>> have a look at the metrics on bug 13665. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-05-27 11:45 GMT+01:00 Gaetan Boisson > >> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello again all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> looking at speed issues there is one thing that i > don't understand, >>>>>>> and i >>>>>>> feel some well versed developpers might have a better > idea of what is >>>>>>> happening. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you query zebra directly on the server, it's > blazingly fast, no >>>>>>> matter >>>>>>> how big your database and how many results you get. (At > least the >>>>>>> difference >>>>>>> is negligible, and we still get very low response > times.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But if you do a search in Koha that brings 20 000 > results, it's >>>>>>> usualy 4 >>>>>>> times faster (maybe more, sorry i don't have > precise metrics here) >>>>>>> than a >>>>>>> search that brings up 1 000 000 results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it consistent with your experience? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If it is, what would be the reason for this? My > understanding is >>>>>>> that the >>>>>>> search code asks zebra for the first n records to > display on the >>>>>>> first page, >>>>>>> and that facets are based on a number of result way > below 20 000 >>>>>>> anyway, so >>>>>>> the total number of results shouldn't really make a > difference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Gaetan Boisson >>>>>>> Chef de projet biblioth??caire >>>>>>> BibLibre >>>>>>> 06 52 42 51 29 >>>>>>> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >>>>>>> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Koha-devel mailing list >>>>>>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>>>>> > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>>>>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>>>>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>>>>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Gaetan Boisson >>>>> Chef de projet biblioth??caire >>>>> BibLibre >>>>> 06 52 42 51 29 >>>>> 108 avenue Breteuil 13006 Marseille >>>>> gaetan.boisson at biblibre.com >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Koha-devel mailing list >>>>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>>> > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation, >>>> research and education through the written word and the arts. >>>> and > >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Koha-devel mailing list >>>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fridolin SOMERS >>> Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me > >>> fridolin.somers at biblibre.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Koha-devel mailing list >>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > > -- > Fridolin SOMERS > Biblibre - P?les support et syst?me > fridolin.somers at biblibre.com > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > From z.tajoli at cineca.it Fri May 29 09:51:09 2015 From: z.tajoli at cineca.it (Tajoli Zeno) Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 09:51:09 +0200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Sort by title. Based only on Title or also on Title-cover ? Message-ID: <55681A6D.5040308@cineca.it> Hi, reading from etc/zebradb/marc_defs/marc21/biblios/biblio-koha-indexdefs.xml I see that from 245 $a are crerated two indexes: Title and Title-cover: Title-cover:w Title-cover:p Title-cover:s Title:w Title:p Title:s Sort by title (A-Z) and (Z-A) in opac are based only on 'Title' Zebra index or also on Title-cover ? It is not clear for me. Bye Zeno Tajoli From tomascohen at gmail.com Fri May 29 14:30:10 2015 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 09:30:10 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Sort by title. Based only on Title or also on Title-cover ? In-Reply-To: <55681A6D.5040308@cineca.it> References: <55681A6D.5040308@cineca.it> Message-ID: It is sorting using the 'Title' index. Look at the URL in the OPAC, it contains sort_by=title_az. Then look for title_az on C4/Search.pm. You will notice it does: $sort_by .= "1=4 : > Hi, > > reading from > etc/zebradb/marc_defs/marc21/biblios/biblio-koha-indexdefs.xml I see that > from 245 $a are crerated two indexes: > Title and Title-cover: > > > Title-cover:w > Title-cover:p > Title-cover:s > Title:w > Title:p > Title:s > > > Sort by title (A-Z) and (Z-A) in opac are based only on 'Title' Zebra > index or also on Title-cover ? > It is not clear for me. > > Bye > Zeno Tajoli > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Tom?s Cohen Arazi Prosecretar?a de Inform?tica Universidad Nacional de C?rdoba ? +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hector.hecaxmmx at gmail.com Sat May 30 06:02:46 2015 From: hector.hecaxmmx at gmail.com (Hector Castro) Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 22:02:46 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] make test in new installation fails Message-ID: Hi Koha fellows I was doing a new installation and "make test" FAIL me. Launchs at the end of the test make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 and some test give me this: t/NorwegianPatronDB.t ............... strictures.pm extra testing active but couldn't load all modules. Missing were: indirect multidimensional Extra testing is auto-enabled in checkouts only, so if you're the author of a strictures using module you need to run: cpan indirect multidimensional bareword::filehandles Someone can tell me if i did something wrong or this is a bug?. make install worked well. Regards -- Atte, Hector Castro -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtompset at hotmail.com Sat May 30 23:40:53 2015 From: mtompset at hotmail.com (Mark Tompsett) Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Koha-devel] Installing from scratch... one more package hosted please? Message-ID: Greetings, Backstory: I felt like trying a base git install from scratch, just to see what the time was like. I torrent downloaded a net install ISO of Debian 8 (Jessie), set it up in VirtualBox, git cloned the Koha source, bit-bz, and qa-test-tools, and ran the install process on the Koha source. I discovered that if you forget to give permissions on the DB, but create the user and password, that the failure of set NAMES ?utf8? is totally not indicative of the real problem. I think there?s a patch idea in there somewhere. Once the Koha was installed, I then attempted to get the qa test tools working. And that led me to installing dh-make-perl just to get libtest-perl-critic-progressive-perl_0.03-1_all.deb installed. Inquiry: Can we please host libtest-perl-critic-progressive-perl_0.03-1_all.deb and/or get it somehow pushed up to Debian? GPML, Mark Tompsett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mtj at kohaaloha.com Sun May 31 04:22:35 2015 From: mtj at kohaaloha.com (Mason James) Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 14:22:35 +1200 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.16.11 released Message-ID: Hi Folks,? The Koha release team are proud to announce the release of Koha 3.16.11.? This is a bugfix/maintenance release? As always, the best option is to upgrade using the debian packages, at? debian.koha-community.org,? Otherwise you can download the tarball at?download.koha-community.org? Full release notes are here? http://koha-community.org/koha-3-16-11-released/? cheers, Mason? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: