[Koha-devel] 942 versus 952

Tomas Cohen Arazi tomascohen at gmail.com
Fri Dec 2 14:32:42 CET 2016


I agree that's the current state of things.

But in my opinion, this should be changed. I don't think itemtypes should
apply to bibliographic records that don't have items. Maybe we need to come
up with a new approach for itemless stuff.

El mié., 30 nov. 2016 a las 10:13, Francois Charbonnier (<
francois.charbonnier at inlibro.com>) escribió:

> Even if the 942 field is not mandatory, I think it's still a good practice
> to use it. The 942's itemtype allows you, when filtering by itemtype, to
> retrieve records that don't have items attached to it. Electronic resources
> for example.
>
> Also, if you don't use the 942 field, be sure to set up the
> "item-level_itypes" system preference properly. In this case :
> item-level_itypes = specific item.
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> François
> François Charbonnier,
> Bibl. prof. / Chef de produits
>
> Tél.  : (888) 604-2627
> francois.charbonnier at inLibro.com
> inLibro | Spécialistes en technologies documentaires | www.inLibro.com
> Le 2016-11-30 à 05:56, Tomas Cohen Arazi a écrit :
>
> You only need 952$y. 942 is a fallback because all items need an
> phenotype, but in the past it was not enforced, specially on import.
>
> El mié., 30 de nov. de 2016 2:11 AM, Karen Myers <karenmyers1 at hotmail.com>
> escribió:
>
> Hi all
>
>
> I am wanting to clarify the usage of the 942$c field versus the 952$y
> field as I am setting up a new bib framework.
>
> I am wondering if it is necessary to have both the 942$c field and the
> 952$y field in the framework as they seem to record the same information
> i.e Koha item type. Is there an advantage to recording the same information
> in both fields and if not which is the preferred? We are using Koha 3.22
>     thanks!
> Karen
> _______________________________________________
> Koha-devel mailing list
> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org
> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
> website : http://www.koha-community.org/
> git : http://git.koha-community.org/
> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
>
> --
> Tomás Cohen Arazi
> Theke Solutions (https://theke.io <http://theke.io/>)
> ✆ +54 9351 3513384 <+54%209%20351%20351-3384>
> GPG: B2F3C15F
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Koha-devel mailing listKoha-devel at lists.koha-community.orghttp://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
> website : http://www.koha-community.org/
> git : http://git.koha-community.org/
> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Koha-devel mailing list
> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org
> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
> website : http://www.koha-community.org/
> git : http://git.koha-community.org/
> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

-- 
Tomás Cohen Arazi
Theke Solutions (https://theke.io <http://theke.io/>)
✆ +54 9351 3513384
GPG: B2F3C15F
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20161202/8bb1fae8/attachment.html>


More information about the Koha-devel mailing list