[Koha-devel] Hide records on Leader 05 = d in OPAC

Paul A paul.a at navalmarinearchive.com
Tue Jan 12 01:56:39 CET 2016


At 12:44 PM 1/11/2016 +1100, David Cook wrote:
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008A_01D14C6D.DDE56680"
>Content-Language: en-au
>Hi all:
>Recently, 
><http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11084>http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11084 
>was pushed to master. It adds a cronjob which deletes bibliographic 
>records, if their LDR05 is d(ie status deleted).

Brendan, David,

Thanks for your work on this. I have sometimes wondered what the LDR, Pos 
05 - Record status d - Deleted "Record has been deleted" actually means.

My question is: how many cataloguers take the time and trouble to modify 
LDR pos05, rather than just "hit delete" for a record?

 From a Koha db viewpoint, either the record is in MySQL and therefore 
(probably?) should get indexed by Zebra, or it has been deleted by a 
cataloguer -- logically gone, terminally, no bytes left on the hard disk -- 
except that Koha has tables "deletedbiblio", "deletedbiblioitems" and 
"deleteditems" which (as far as I can tell) do not contain the LDR, 
therefore cannot cross-reference pos05=d (and I'm not certain that there is 
a way to "undelete" -- can it be done?)

Best -- Paul


>
>
>While Im all for that, Im thinking that it would also be a good idea to 
>hide these records with LDR05 din the OPAC before the cronjob is run.
>
>
>
>We cant necessarily rely on all Koha instances running this cronjob, nor 
>can we rely on the frequency. Shouldnt we be hiding these records from the 
>OPAC as soon as theyre marked as deleted?
>
>
>
>Ive opened a bug for this purpose: 
><http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15537>http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
>
>
>
>It should be a pretty easy change, especially when using special attribute 
>@attr 14=1 to avoid past OpacSuppression problems, but I thought Id ask 
>folk if its something theyd be interested in. Wed probably still want to 
>see these records in the Staff Client, as we want to be able to find all 
>records in the database in the Staff Client.
>
>
>
>I admit that I have a special interest in this where I might be overlaying 
>existing records using a mostly empty skeleton record generated from an 
>OAI-PMH identifier and a OAI-PMH deleted status (OAI-PMH doesnt send 
>metadata for deleted records). Id match the existing record in Koha using 
>the identifier, and then set LDR05 to din accordance with the OAI-PMH 
>deleted status. Then, that record would disappear from the OPAC, so that 
>end users dont see this skeleton record.
>
>
>
>David Cook
>
>Systems Librarian
>
>Prosentient Systems
>
>72/330 Wattle St, Ultimo, NSW 2007
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Koha-devel mailing list
>Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org
>http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
>website : http://www.koha-community.org/
>git : http://git.koha-community.org/
>bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

---
Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation,
research and education through the written word and the arts.
<http://NavalMarineArchive.com> and <http://UltraMarine.ca>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20160111/dc8b44f7/attachment.html>


More information about the Koha-devel mailing list