[Koha-devel] 942 versus 952

[Tomas Cohen Arazi]

You only need 952$y. 942 is a fallback because all items need an phenotype,
but in the past it was not enforced, specially on import.

El mié., 30 de nov. de 2016 2:11 AM, Karen Myers <karenmyers1 at hotmail.com>
escribió:

Hi all


I am wanting to clarify the usage of the 942$c field versus the 952$y field
as I am setting up a new bib framework.

I am wondering if it is necessary to have both the 942$c field and the
952$y field in the framework as they seem to record the same information
i.e Koha item type. Is there an advantage to recording the same information
in both fields and if not which is the preferred? We are using Koha 3.22
    thanks!
Karen
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

-- 
Tomás Cohen Arazi
Theke Solutions (https://theke.io <http://theke.io/>)
✆ +54 9351 3513384
GPG: B2F3C15F
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20161130/61c5db27/attachment.html>