[Koha-devel] Can we do away with items.onloan?
Martha Fuerst
mfuerst at hmcpl.org
Mon May 21 15:42:23 CEST 2018
So this is interesting - with as muddy as some of our data can get, I only got one result. It’s an item that was checked out to a “problems” account back in October 2017 with a due date of April 2nd, 2018. I thought maybe it was due to an extension of the due date from the checkout screen (but then clearly we would have way more instances of this).
I edited the query a bit and pulled this. So it’s off, but only by a little bit. Has anyone else seen it be off by a bunch? Or is it due to the difference in the datetime vs date formats of the fields?
select i.itemnumber, i.date_due, c.onloan from issues i inner join items c using (itemnumber) where date(i.date_due) != c.onloan
itemnumber date_due onloan
611020 2018-04-02 23:59:00 2018-04-01
Marti Fuerst
Systems Librarian
Huntsville-Madison County Public Library
915 Monroe St, Huntsville, AL 35801
http://hmcpl.org/ — mfuerst at hmcpl.org
> On May 19, 2018, at 11:50 PM, Barton Chittenden <barton at bywatersolutions.com> wrote:
>
> select count(*) from issues inner join items using (itemnumber) where date(issues.date_due) != items.onloan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20180521/344cadf3/attachment.html>
More information about the Koha-devel
mailing list