[Koha-devel] A case against some uses of C4::Context->userenv
dcook at prosentient.com.au
dcook at prosentient.com.au
Mon Sep 30 02:03:03 CEST 2019
Totally agree too. Also makes unit testing a million times easier.
David Cook
Systems Librarian
Prosentient Systems
72/330 Wattle St
Ultimo, NSW 2007
Australia
Office: 02 9212 0899
Direct: 02 8005 0595
From: Koha-devel <koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org> On Behalf Of Renvoize, Martin
Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2019 3:14 AM
To: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen at gmail.com>
Cc: koha-devel <koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org>
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] A case against some uses of C4::Context->userenv
I generally agree here, I'd rather explicitly pass things like this into objects on instantiation and die if they're not present.. that way we catch cases of missing environments early and as you state, userenv harks back the CGI days and we should generally be moving forward and away from those patterns in my opinion.
Martin Renvoize
<https://www.ptfs-europe.com/>
Development Team Manager
Phone: +44 (0) 1483 378728
Mobile: +44 (0) 7725 985 636
Email: <mailto:martin.renvoize at ptfs-europe.com> martin.renvoize at ptfs-europe.com
Fax: +44 (0) 800 756 6384
<https://www.ptfs-europe.com> www.ptfs-europe.com
Registered in the United Kingdom No. 06416372 VAT Reg No. 925 7211 30
The information contained in this email message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this email message in error, please email the sender at info at ptfs-europe.com <mailto:info at ptfs-europe.com>
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 17:42, Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen at gmail.com <mailto:tomascohen at gmail.com> > wrote:
Hi all, I've been looking at the 'Claims returned' work (awesome!) [1] and I've noticed a pattern we should, in my opinion, start avoiding and reverting.
It is quite common to find uses of C4::Context->userenv in the Koha::* namespace, either as a plain requirement (if the borrowernumber is not set we bail out) or just as a fallback. I think it is wrong to expect such environment status in our logic. It complicates things in various ways. [2]
It is done this way because:
- We come from the CGI era, in which it made perfect sense
- Cookie auth is well established on the UI
- When migrating from C4:* into Koha:* it is easier to just keep the current behavior and then evolve.
I propose we leave them out, and add as a parameter whatever we are expecting to find in the userenv hashref. That way we could use this new libs in the API (which is not cookie-only).
Looking forward to hear your opinions
[1] https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14697
[2] CLI scripts are using Koha::* libraries, and we then need to 'emulate' that userenv or even add code to detect we don't have a userenv.
--
Tomás Cohen Arazi
Theke Solutions (http://theke.io <http://theke.io/> )
✆ +54 9351 3513384
GPG: B2F3C15F
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org <mailto:Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org>
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20190930/80ce3901/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 484 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20190930/80ce3901/attachment.sig>
More information about the Koha-devel
mailing list