[Koha-devel] Persistent identifiers in MARC record?

[dcook at prosentient.com.au]

Hi Marcel,

 

Sorry that I haven’t had a chance to reply on Bugzilla. I’ve been super busy. 

 

For what it’s worth, I’m fine with it being stored in the MARC, so long as it’s also stored in the relational database. I thought it was an either/or question rather than a both/and question.

 

Curious to hear what people have to say!

 

David Cook

Systems Librarian

Prosentient Systems

72/330 Wattle St

Ultimo, NSW 2007

Australia

 

Office: 02 9212 0899

Online: 02 8005 0595

 

From: Koha-devel <koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org> On Behalf Of Marcel de Rooy
Sent: Monday, 20 July 2020 5:10 PM
To: koha-devel <koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org>
Subject: [Koha-devel] Persistent identifiers in MARC record?

 

Hi all,

Last couple of weeks I had a discussion with David about this subject on bug 24544.

Please see https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24544

 

What do you think? If your authority, biblio or item has a PID, should we save it in MARC too? Noting that MARC is just a representation or view of your data. We already have a biblio_metadata table that allows for more. What if we already had multiple views? If you can, you are welcome to contribute to that discussion on the bug report.

 

Thanks,

Marcel

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20200721/c780a5eb/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 484 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20200721/c780a5eb/attachment-0001.sig>