[koha-es] Marshall Breeding - Encuesta anual

Tomas Cohen Arazi tomascohen en theke.io
Mie Dic 16 11:23:55 CET 2020


Retransmito mensaje de Marshall Breeding solicitando a las bibliotecas que
usan Koha que llenen la encuesta 2020.

La encuesta permite mostrar la evolución del uso de Koha en el mundo
dándole visibilidad y también muestra debilidades y fortalezas del mismo.
Eso nos ayuda a mejorarlo también.

Indica que quienes lo hayan llenado el año pasado por favor vuelvan a
hacerlo.

Saludos!

====

Mensaje original en inglés


To all libraries using Koha:

I'm collecting data for the 2020 edition of the International Library
Automation Perceptions survey.

This survey, now in its fourteenth annual iteration, provides an
opportunity for libraries to register their perceptions of the strategic
automation products they use, organizations that provide these products,
and the quality of support delivered. The survey also probes at
considerations for migrating to new systems and the level of interest in
open source products.

As open source software supported both by the general community and by a
variety of different service organizations, some special considerations
apply to Koha. In the libraries.org directory, Koha is represented by a
combination of the name Koha and the primary support organization involved.
(For example Koha - Catalyst IT, Koha -- ByWater Solutions). Libraries
relying entirely on community support or internal resources are represented
as Koha - Independent. If there are any special support arrangements not
covered by these conventions, just mention that in the comments area of the
survey. In this way the survey will be able to reflect both the
functionality of the Koha software and the quality of support provided.
This model of representing libraries using Koha isn't perfect, but is a
pragmatic approach that aggregates all users of Koha while also segregating
the different support scenarios.

Participation in this survey will help amplify the visibility of Koha among
those interested in library automation.

While the numeric rating scales support the statistical results of the
study, it's the comments offered that provide the most insight into the
current state of library automation satisfaction. Comments will be
published in the survey results, redacted to conceal text that might
identify the individual or organization responding. The raw data for the
survey will not be shared, but reports are available that provide a variety
of ways to view results.

Please help your fellow librarians who might be in the process of
evaluating library automation options by responding to the survey. Any
information regarding vendor performance and product quality can be helpful
when making strategic decisions regarding automation alternatives. A large
number of responses strengthen the impact of the survey and the subsequent
report.

If you have responded in previous years, please respond again this year to
help identify any trends regarding improvement or worsening of the products
or support services.

For more information about the survey, for instructions on how to
participate, and to see results of previous year's survey reports, see:
 https://librarytechnology.org/perceptions/2020/invite/
I hope that all libraries using Koha will respond. Feel free to forward
this request to any other library-related list.

You can view the report summarizing the results of last year's survey,
including data from all previous editions, here:
 https://librarytechnology.org/perceptions/2019/

Please let me know if there are any questions regarding the survey.


Marshall Breeding
Editor, Library Technology Guides
www.librarytechnology.org
Marshall.breeding en librarytechnology.org
twitter.com/mbreeding
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-es/attachments/20201216/8d6e8de1/attachment.htm>


Más información sobre la lista de distribución Koha-es