[Koha-patches] [PATCH] [followup](MT3160) fix address request

[Nahuel ANGELINETTI]

Le 01/07/2010 10:00, Chris Cormack a écrit :
> * Nahuel ANGELINETTI (nahuel.angelinetti at biblibre.com) wrote:
>    
>> Le 01/07/2010 02:03, Owen Leonard a écrit :
>>      
>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Michael Hafen
>>> <mdhafen at tech.washk12.org>   wrote:
>>>        
>>>> I have found in Mysql that CONCAT_WS handles NULL values well.  Have you
>>>> looked into that?  The syntax is a little different from CONCAT.
>>>>          
>>> Aren't we trying to avoid functions which are MySQL-specific?
>>>
>>>        
>> Why ? Koha doesn't work with another DBMS...
>> No one is maintaining the postgre structure, and I think all code is
>> MySQL specific.
>> My point of view, is the development of koha must do some good code
>> for one DBMS, instead of bad code for all DBMS.
>> For the moment, koha doesn't use an ORM that permit to use some
>> DBMS, and don't take care about "SQL".
>>      
> A major goal, for 3.4 as I have stated is for it to remove the mysql
> specific sql. So while its galens call on this patch for 3.2. I wont be
> accepting mysql specific sql for 3.4
>    
Why don't use an ORM to avoid ANY sql code ? And don't take care of 
writing SQL, just using functions like in Django :)

-- 
Nahuel ANGELINETTI