[Koha-bugs] [Bug 33277] Correctly handle linking subfields with no defined thesaurus

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33277

--- Comment #23 from Nick Clemens <nick at bywatersolutions.com> ---
(In reply to Frank Hansen from comment #22)

> I would still like to comment on ind2=4. As for us, we treat them as local
> subject headings only and they are not included in any thesaurus. Therefore,
> I would prefer not to see any authority records for either 008/11=| (or
> 008/11=n) in our catalog, even if the format allows it.

Are you saying you won't import those records - or you want those records to be
ignored when linking? The former sounds easy enough, the second seems it would
require a syspref to not link those

> I also want to comment on 040$f. According to the Swedish cataloguing
> guidelines here
...
> So I question about allowing to omit 040$f when 008/11=z.

This sounds like a comment on cataloging standards, and maybe something that
can be set in frameworks. But I don't think we need code for this?

> What causes the most trouble for me is, as mentioned earlier, that non-6XX
> fields are hardcoded to LCSH. This creates problems for libraries outside
> the US, as we typically do not use LCSH names. I wish we could skip
> thesaurus search for those fields.

These patches do now skip searching thesaurus when linking non-subject fields

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.