[Koha-bugs] [Bug 33277] Correctly handle linking subfields with no defined thesaurus

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33277

--- Comment #24 from Frank Hansen <frank.hansen at ub.lu.se> ---
(In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #23)
> (In reply to Frank Hansen from comment #22)
> 
> > I would still like to comment on ind2=4. As for us, we treat them as local
> > subject headings only and they are not included in any thesaurus. Therefore,
> > I would prefer not to see any authority records for either 008/11=| (or
> > 008/11=n) in our catalog, even if the format allows it.
> 
> Are you saying you won't import those records - or you want those records to
> be ignored when linking? The former sounds easy enough, the second seems it
> would require a syspref to not link those
> 

Sorry if I was unclear. Records with ind2=4 is not exported from National
Library catalogue at first. So they will not be imported to our local
catalogue. We are not planning to create any either manually or automatically.

> > I also want to comment on 040$f. According to the Swedish cataloguing
> > guidelines here
> ...
> > So I question about allowing to omit 040$f when 008/11=z.
> 
> This sounds like a comment on cataloging standards, and maybe something that
> can be set in frameworks. But I don't think we need code for this?
> 
Maybe not. We will use 040$f to specify system/thesaurus conventions in any
case. I just want to make sure that it not have a negative impact on filtering
on thesauruses if we omit 040$f.

> > What causes the most trouble for me is, as mentioned earlier, that non-6XX
> > fields are hardcoded to LCSH. This creates problems for libraries outside
> > the US, as we typically do not use LCSH names. I wish we could skip
> > thesaurus search for those fields.
> 
> These patches do now skip searching thesaurus when linking non-subject fields

I'm testing bug33277 and what I have seen so far looks good. (both ES and
Zebra)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.