https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35310 --- Comment #23 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net> --- (In reply to Pedro Amorim from comment #22)
There may be some other things worth improving here, personally I don't think the string "«Note: 1 out of 2 renewals have been logged»" is a clear enough way of conveying to the staff user what is happening or has happened, i.e. a person who does not know the history behind these datatabase tables will likely not fully understand what that string is referring to (in my opinion anyway, I didn't and was thrown off by it, but that's me!). But I also don't have a better suggestion right now!
Maybe «Note: 1 out of 2 renewals have been logged (old versions of Koha didn't log the date)» Or «Old versions of Koha didn't keep renewals dates, so only 1 out of 2 renewals have them.»
(In reply to Victor Grousset/tuxayo from comment #21)
I see, because the old data isn't migrated due to missing date, it's left here and all places might need to account for two sources of renewals.
This is not my understanding of the situation, but I may be wrong. My understanding is that old data was not migrated due to missing datA, not date. Before the checkout_renewals table, renewals information just wasn't logged individually.
I recall from the patron checkout history that the old checkouts still have the number of renewals. (View => 1 out of 2 renewals [...]) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.