https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8132 --- Comment #85 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #84)
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #83)
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #82)
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #81)
What do you suggest?
Maybe we should stick to the scope that the title suggests. Do not delete items with holds. Biblio level holds are out of scope.
No, it's the main point of this bug report.
We want to prevent deletion of the last item of a bibliographic record with a biblio-level hold on it.
Sorry, I can't agree on that reading comments and patches.
See comment 0: """ I don't think it always did this - but I tested today on 3.8 and it deleted an item and a bib record (cause I checked that box) that had holds on it. """ Then comment 1: """ This is how you end up with phantom holds that can never be deleted. """ And comment 20. I can confirm that I wrote those patches to prevent such deletion, and so phantom holds. That's why I rebuilt a bit the interface to display the why an item cannot be deleted, and so introduced the new "last_item_for_hold" error code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.