https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21774 --- Comment #10 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #9)
I'm not sure no_split logic was the correct solution, so I have no issue with this removal. However, I think they may be tried to use that to split or not split based on the frameworkcode, because the field might not be repeatable, and so it is a little larger than this change alone. Just my thoughts on this. I could be off on a different tangent.
Hi Mark, Split or not based on the frameworkcode or repeatableness of the subfield is imo an enhancement request; this was no part of earlier code. If feel it could be useful though. I could also think of having the option to use another separator than pipe. But they should imo be handled on a new report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.