https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20844 Aleisha Amohia <aleisha@catalyst.net.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |In Discussion CC| |aleisha@catalyst.net.nz --- Comment #30 from Aleisha Amohia <aleisha@catalyst.net.nz> --- (In reply to Alex Buckley from comment #29)
It would be good to have a consistent approach throughout Koha for dealing with reserves on lost items.
A question do you think it would be best to split this patch up so it is only dealing with allocated (waiting) holds. This would alter the behavior of the patches on the bug report which check for reserve type of 'waiting' or 'reserved'.
Then we would only need to add reserve handling to /tools/batchMod.pl as longoverdue.pl and pendingreserves.pl don't touch waiting reserves.
Amending longoverdue.pl and pendingreserves.pl could go in another bug report building on this to handle un-allocated holds, just to prevent too much scope creep on this bug report?
It would be great to have some feedback on this so we know what the next steps are. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.