http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11023 Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA CC| |kyle@bywatersolutions.com --- Comment #18 from Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> --- Is there any reason this couldn't be done using dateaccessioned rather than adding a new field to items? I imagine the test for items being 'new' is less than simple in some cases, and I can see a definite advantage in pre-setting items as new rather than determining that on the fly for every item. QA Issue: biblioitems_columns doesn't seem like it belongs in Items.pm, you could easily use DBIx::Class to get the columns names: http://search.cpan.org/~frew/DBIx-Class-0.08121/lib/DBIx/Class/ResultSource.... so no need for a special subroutine! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.