http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13607 --- Comment #8 from Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #7)
I wasn't disputing upsert as a word.. more that in my experience it's the PUT method that used for it:
Yeah, I'd misread what you said there.
As for the lack of browser support.. I can now having googled it see where your coming from on this.. It's not the browsers so much as the html versions. Pretty much all browser will support the requests via javascript, but it would seem the HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 both only support GET and POST as Form submission methods. Hmm, this one does then need some thought applying.
Hmm, these probably aren't suitable for form submission anyway. It's not like they're providing HTML back.
What I'm thinking here, as you've already put the work in, is to sign off on this as it stands and let it progress into koha. However, I hope to deprecate the /svc namespace at some point and push for a nice concise set of restful routes (including a patrons route).
Yes, this would be good. I just had to conform to what was already in koha. Or really, pick one of the methods in koha and conform to that (which was an obvious choice: pick the one that gives me consistency with the authentication endpoint.) Some rationalisation of what's available would be good. Note that with my changes to C4::Service, it'd be quite easy to allow a 'format=json' type argument to change what you're getting. We could even add support for 'format=usmarc' if you want to use that as your formatting method. I'm sure someone somewhere likes that idea. They would be a crazy person. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.