https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21469 Heather <flyingendpaper@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |flyingendpaper@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Heather <flyingendpaper@gmail.com> --- I just found out about this bug thanks to ashimema on Mattermost!! It's great! I think this bug should refer to https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34482 , " Improve MARC21 7xx linking fields in bibliographic records [Omnibus]." And the formatting could be corrected, c.f. the correctly formatted examples in the MARC21 format for the 773 field, https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd773.html So rather than prepending the data from the 003 in brackets, it should be in parentheses. And depending on the source code in the 003, there are differences, e.g.: OCLC records (yes, tons of libraries don't use OCLC, but as the largest source of bibliographic records in the world, there are a lot of OCLC records out there!): A child record such as this one: https://keys.bywatersolutions.com/cgi-bin/koha/opac-MARCdetail.pl?biblionumb... Generated from a parent record such as this one: https://keys.bywatersolutions.com/cgi-bin/koha/opac-MARCdetail.pl?biblionumb... Needs the alphabetic characters preceeding the OCLC number in from the 001 field stripped if they are present. More information on OCLC number formatting in 001 fields over time is here: https://help.oclc.org/Metadata_Services/WorldShare_Collection_Manager/Data_s... DLC records would need spacing respected (corrected?), c.f. the examples in the MARC21 format. I would like to be able to sign off on this bug when it's ready, but I'm not really seeing a test plan yet--are y'all still working on it, ashimema & Katrin? Tx! h2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.