https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22700 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de --- Comment #12 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #10)
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #5)
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #4)
Comment on attachment 87943 [details] [review] [review] [review] Bug 22700: Make biblio_metadata prefetchable from Koha::Biblio
Review of attachment 87943 [details] [review] [review] [review]: -----------------------------------------------------------------
This doesn't feel entirely correct yet I'm afraid.. though I'm not close enough to the biblio_metadatas table to entirely understand whether we expect it to every be a more than one-to-one relationship with the biblio's table.
It is a one-to-one relationship.
Hum, really? If it was, we would have not create a new table for that. We could have different representation of the record (MARC, MARCXML, etc.), for different MARC profiles. IMO this is completely wrong, but I may have missed a previous discussion.
It is 1:1 right now - splitting it off biblioitems was for performance reasons, not database design IIRC: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17196 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.