https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26181 --- Comment #9 from Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #3)
I left the AllowHoldPolicyOverride name in the x-koha-override header on purpose. To have less friction on this patches. But I really preferred something like 'holds-policy'. Food for thought.
I'm tempted by the actual rule/policy failure names being in x-koha-override.. and in this case as the override is only available as a 'all or nothing' we should start with a special 'any' rule. So x-koha-override: [ any ] # Meaning, override whatever we failed for in the future x-koha-override: [ any, damaged_item, transfer_restriction, age_restriction, etc, etc ] # An override per policy violation error that can be thrown and individually override. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.