http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11202 --- Comment #54 from mathieu saby <mathsabypro@gmail.com> ---
1) In general I am having problems with pubdate and acqdate searches in UNIMARC compared to their MARC21 equivalents Mathieu, could you please take a look? Syntaxes I tried: pubdate=yyyy, pubdate:yyyy With QueryParser: pubdate(yyyy), acqdate(yyyy)
I will take a look
3) In general I am a bit worried about removing indexes. I can see, why some subfields are not making much sense to index, I also have read the comments on bug 11119, but some of the changes might be debatable. For example the following change could break functionality some libraries rely on. Maybe it would not hurt to keep those around?
-#FIXME Fields 603, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 646 are not defined in Unimarc, but may be used by some libraries.
I don't know who added these indexes and why, but they were never used in Unimarc, so it was clearly a mistake to put them in standard configuration files. Maybe some french library made one day a very specific developpment using these fields (I'm thinking of Frantiq network, specialised in Archeology). Or maybe it is just a mistake... I will send a message to french list to warn everybody that if a library want to index those fields in 3.14 they need to edit the config files before reindexing. Mathieu Mathieu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.