https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17511 --- Comment #38 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Phil Ringnalda from comment #37)
It would be a good idea to remove the last mentions of $0 from the patch, and also from the bug summary, since this isn't at all a $0 implementation. $0 is a repeatable subfield, with specified contents of "(MARC org code from 003 in an authority record)control number of an authority record", which isn't what this is doing.
I haven't reviewed these patches in a while, so I can't speak to the first part of that. However, note that $0 is more complex than "(MARC org code from 003 in an authority record)control number of an authority record". See "$0 - Authority record control number or standard number" at the following URL for more details: https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdcntf.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.