https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21063 --- Comment #44 from Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Andrew Isherwood from comment #42)
(In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #37)
(In reply to Andrew Isherwood from comment #35)
(In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #33)
Also, why to have three columns for patron identity?
We had different customers asking for different fields (for sorting and filtering), so it was easiest just to include all three, then they can be turned on or off as needed
I don't like this, it makes inconsistancy in system, we should use standard pattern here: Firstname Surname (cardnumber) with link to moremember.pl. Ideally generated by patron-title.inc template.
I think this raises a bigger question of whether the current convention of Firstname Surname (cardnumber) addresses users' requirements. In our experience here, it doesn't. I think it's maybe worth having a separate discussion of whether we should be reconsidering the current situation and whether we should be making other DataTable instances in line with what we have here. I think it's certainly worth at least discussing.
Which does beg the question of what we do to achieve PQA on this bug. We don't want it to be dependent on a potentially far reaching discussion. Do you think we should keep it as is, pending the discussion, or make it consistent with elsewhere, then address as appropriate following the discussion?
My opinion is, to make it consistent with current system. As you pointed out, such a discussion could take 'some' time... And is definitely out of scope of this report... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.