https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24254 --- Comment #41 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #40)
Right.. I think this is pretty solid now.. Passing QA.
However, it does make me ask the question as to why our Koha::Item->store routine and cataloguing/additem.pl both do a >=/ge check on itemlost. I think you've discussed and proved to me that the check on itemlost is purely boolean.. false (0/undef) vs defined/not zero... but I can't help but have a nagging feeling the negatives used to be meaningful in some dim and distant past.
Maybe you mixed up with notforloan? (negative values are for "ordered") -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.