http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9016 --- Comment #83 from Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivilahti@jns.fi> --- (In reply to M. de Rooy from comment #82)
Olli, Since this is a larger set of patches, it could be helpful while reviewing it to know what you exactly tested when signing off? Is it possible to elaborate on that? Thanks in advance..
Wow, this is a big guestion. Basically I followed the test plan for this bug and for each dependant bug. Verifying from the SQL-client that data is preserved and the described database changes happen. I didn't do any Perl::Critic runs, as I am not very familiar with those and I get pretty uncontrolled results with it :) We are using this featureset in our semi-production server and have uncovered some bugs and subsequently reported them in other bug entries (which Joubu has promptly fixed). Unfortunately I didn't keep track of the test paths I took, but I can guarantee I didn't reach a 100% test coverage. Maybe 70% for this patch + the critical path. Tho I would applaud a unified Koha testing methodology to be adopted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.