https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12532 --- Comment #120 from Hammat wele <hammat.wele@inlibro.com> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #116)
Sorry, I also meant to say I think the guarantor email should go in the cc field rather than to field (unless the to field is empty in which case just put guarantor in to). This complicates things a little but I feel it's the right behaviour
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #118)
I agree Marcel.. It was late last night.
So.. In short, I'd like some explanations from the original author as to why they picked the changes they did.. I still don't understand a number of them.
I think hooking into _send_message_by_email in C4::Letters is starting to feel like it might be the right place... but setting a `cc` rather than additional `to`
Hi martin, The main goal here was to send email to both the guarantor and the guarantee either we use the to or cc field. But I agree with you, we should use the cc field to send the message to the garantors instead adding garantor addresses to the to field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.