https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23875 --- Comment #11 from Ere Maijala <ere.maijala@helsinki.fi> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #10)
publication date can get quickly problematic for serials... the first date in 008 is usually quite old. Every approach has its own problems ;)
True, and I didn't mean to imply that should be a default. :)
Maybe we can move the discussion of adding a hardcoded biblionumber index into another bug, but it really bugs me that the sorting of a clearly numerical value would be alphabetic... it just seems very wrong. I've ended up explaining the 'last resort' ordering a lot of times to libraries.
I'm fine either way. But clearly at least a follow-up to this bug is needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.