https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28057 --- Comment #17 from Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #16)
Why aren't we going further here?
IMO we should completely remove the code related to biblioitemnumber.
This comment: 405 ## Here we go backwards again to create hash of biblioitemnumber to itemnumbers 406 ## this is important when we have analytic items which may be on another record
It implies that we must use biblioitemnumber to be correct, but we actually should use biblionumber.
Is this correct?
The comment is meant to describe what we are doing so that we can fix it in the future I don't go further to keep this small for backporting, but I agree, we should rewrite much of this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.