http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7167 --- Comment #69 from Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com> --- (In reply to comment #68)
(In reply to comment #67)
I think it would be best to catch that error and inform the user there is an incorrectly named file. The goal is to lower the barrier to entry for developers, and if a developer doesn't understand the correct naming scheme, they should get useful feedback ("a file with an invalid name was provided") instead of a scary error.
I am still working on this report. But in advance: I think we should have two sets of dbrevs: the numbered ones belonging to approved, pushed patches and unnumbered ones, belonging to patches in dev stage. These last set should only be available in dev mode and can (theoretically) be executed in any order.
That makes sense to me. If everything has to have a numeric dbrev, even code that might not ever work well enough to make it into Koha, we might as well just continues to use the current updatedatabase.pl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.