http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14380 Barton Chittenden <barton@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Barton Chittenden <barton@bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #3)
I think I disagree about the 'one line'. Once you renew the overdue process restarts and is not in any way related to the first one, I'd avoid mixing the data. It would make it really hard to see why the amount is as high as it is. With the 2 different due dates you get a clear clue.
I see a renewal more like a new checkout - only that Koha doesn't treat a renewal as a new checkout as some other systems do (which is fine!).
But I totally agree about the description being misused.
I think we need to think about this a bit more and should note it as a use case/test case we need to test and make sure works properly.
Katrin, After discussion with Kyle Hall, I agree with you assessment: Closing the first fine and creating a new fine on renewal is standard behavior for Koha. This still leaves the issue of the second Fine not being closed. I'm going to mark the ticket as "RESOLVED/INVALID", and open a new ticket which specifically addresses the un-closed fine. I'll carry your comments regarding a test case forward to the new ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.