https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23875 --- Comment #9 from Ere Maijala <ere.maijala@helsinki.fi> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #8)
Maybe we should have an unchangeable index for biblionumber then? The sorting could quickly become an issue. People tend to search very 'broadly' and then the tie breaker would come in quickly. At least that's what we see with Zebra quite often with searches for single words and similar.
Using non-numeric sort doesn't really matter for tie-breaker unless you care for the order. I'd actually like us to have a hard-coded biblionumber index field. One could also argue that biblionumber should only be the last resort, and publication date should be the primary. We'll probably end up making it configurable. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.