https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31727 Kevin Carnes <kevin.carnes@ub.lu.se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|koha-bugs@lists.koha-commun |kevin.carnes@ub.lu.se |ity.org | CC| |kevin.carnes@ub.lu.se --- Comment #3 from Kevin Carnes <kevin.carnes@ub.lu.se> --- Thank for catching these problems. I made the false assumption that the database table was only for the first table of rules and I used the template name instead of the database column name for unseen_renewals_allowed. I've made an atomic update that removes these rules when there is no suspension_chargeperiod rule (this is a rule that should be made when saving the first table of rules). It also renames any remaining unseenrenewalsallowed to unseen_renewals_allowed. It would be helpful if somebody else could check this to make sure it's right. It's possible that suspension_chargeperiod is not a accurate check or it might be better to only delete them if the still have the default values. All corrections are appreciated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.