https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31022 --- Comment #4 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #3)
I do however find it really weird still that you can define more than one definition for the same response status on the endpoint...
i.e. the internal 400 definitions for the validator software and then our own one for our own errors.
I would have expected our definition to take precedence over the internal one and thus need it to be a superset of the built-in one.
Interesting.
Doesn't our definition just overload the default/internal one? It used to return a 500 because it wasn't considered a valid response in the spec, which I find correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.