http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9490 Bug ID: 9490 Summary: Show responsibility statement (245c) under title and move authors down in OPAC XSLT Classification: Unclassified Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard@myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl In opac results and opac detail xslt a list of all "authors" is shown under the title, built from 1XX and 7XX in MARC21. Not all entries in 7XX will be authors. People writing an introduction, illustrating a book, etc. will be in 7XX. They are not authors. Showing the statement of responsibility under the title here will be more clear (IMO) in opac results and opac detail. Moving the author and all 7XXs under one heading like "name entries" or something better (suggestions are welcome..) keeps them available for clicking etc. (At least in opac detail) Another (perhaps less obvious) example, we have lots of auction catalogs with the auction house in 110 and the collectioners in 700. They (most always) have no 245c. The auction house is most often also the publisher. We would like to list the auction house as publisher on opac results and show auction house and collectioners under name entries in opac detail. I attach two example patches that I am using now just as illustration. They will not apply in master because they come from a slightly customized 3.8. Some examples from our catalog: [Showing the auction catalogs:] http://library.rijksmuseum.nl/cgi-bin/koha/opac-search.pl?idx=kw&idx=kw&idx=kw&do=Search&limit=mc-itemtype%2Cphr%3AAUC&sort_by=pubdate_dsc [opac results: resp. stat. under title:] http://library.rijksmuseum.nl/cgi-bin/koha/opac-search.pl?q=vermeer [opac detail: resp. stat. and name entries:] http://library.rijksmuseum.nl/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=21054... Before rebasing this to master, I hope to get some feedback from you. What do you think? Would such a change benefit a general library too? Would it need yet another syspref :) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.