http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11193 --- Comment #8 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to mathieu saby from comment #7)
My personal opinion is that QP having been introduced in 2012, it should be well documented and bug-proof, and the older code should have been deprecated.
Mathieu
That would imply that someone was still working on QP ;). As far as I know, no one is actually actively maintaining or enhancing that code. I have some ideas about how to do that, but I don't have the time/money/sponsorship/whatever to do it. The older code is still used in many many cases even when QP is activated, so deprecating the older code is really not an option at this stage. As for documentation, http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=documentation:technical:search... might give you some guidance, although obviously it won't be the same since it's implemented differently in Koha. As far as I know, Evergreen doesn't have a search engine per se. Rather, it uses special tables and full-text indexing within PostgreSQL, so a lot of things (like facets) are totally irrelevant for Koha. But yeah... in the end there's no one who is currently maintaining QP, as far as I know, so I wouldn't expect too much from it at the moment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.