https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23875 --- Comment #7 from Ere Maijala <ere.maijala@helsinki.fi> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6)
I am not sure if I understand the issue compeletely, but why would local-number be scary as a number? local-number is usually the biblionumber, right? And if it is, I am in doubt about what Nick says that you could just remap it to 001 - at least I would expect issues with that.
Yes, it's usually biblionumber, but there's nothing preventing one from e.g. adding other fields in it too. Unless we hard-code a field for biblionumber, we can't positively say it's always a number.
If we don't sort numerical... that meanst 9 999 2 22 1 11 ... something like that?
Yes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.