https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22972 --- Comment #22 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #21)
1. [advanced editor] In the advanced editor, if a authority record has more than one 024 field, all occurrences of the indicated subfield are concatenated into a single string and placed in a single $1 subfield.
2. [update/merge] Adding the 024 field with the subfield indicated in the configuration to the authority record does not add subfield $1 to the heading field in bibliographic records linked with the authority record in question.
3. [link] In a situation where authority and bibliographic records have been loaded into the system from an external source, and then the linking process has been started (link_bibs_to_authorities.pl), the 024 $1 subfields (or other subfields indicated in the configuration, respectively) are not added as $1 subfields in the corresponding headings of the bibliographic records.
There is also the question of how Koha should behave in the case of authority records with the 024 $1 subfields already present in the database and linked to bibliographic records - wouldn't we need a script to rewrite the headings and add the $1 subfields.
And a final note: displaying information from the subfield $1 in the bibliographic record view seems very unergonomic to us, especially for URIs outside the list hardcoded in the XSLT (currently: viaf and wikidata), such as ISNI. We would suggest integrating this information into the functionality introduced by bug 29948, as a possible follow-up.
Thanks Janusz for this detailed list of pending issues here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.