https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30822 --- Comment #17 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #10)
But maybe we need that part, for biblio deletions, what do you think?
+ if ( $record_type eq 'biblio' && ( @updated_biblionumbers || @deleted_biblionumbers ) ) { + my $indexer = Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer->new({ index => $Koha::SearchEngine::BIBLIOS_INDEX }); + if ( @deleted_biblionumbers ) { + $indexer->index_records( \@deleted_biblionumbers, "recordDelete", "biblioserver" ); + } else { + $indexer->index_records( \@updated_biblionumbers, "specialUpdate", "biblioserver" ); + } + }
I agree that for consistency, we should address that too. But we could say that this can be done on a new report. The title of this report is scoped to BatchCommitRecords. And we are talking BatchRevert here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.