9 Jul
2015
9 Jul
'15
11:01 a.m.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14494 --- Comment #7 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2)
Hm, I feel a bit like this builds in a secret feature - if I use 9998 it will be slow, but if I use 9999 it will be faster?
When we fixed the same thing for debarments it made more sense, as the 'ulimited' debarment uses 9999 automatically, without the user entering a date. For the patron expiry the date is defined by the library and could be anything.
We should not do hardcoded tests on 9999. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.