https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101 --- Comment #13 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Lari Strand from comment #9)
"Keeping an itemnumber in this table that does no longer exist is bad practice."
We still have deleted-tables so I don't consider the data as non-existing.
Dont you think that we should adhere to proven standards as to SQL, normalization, etc ? :)
If we touch these old_-tables like this and destroy this archived data that can be linked still with deleted-tables, shouldn't we do the same to action_logs? I consider action_logs as an "archive" table just like old_issues or old_reserves (not sure if we do this already, though. Remove itemnumbers/biblionumbers from action_logs that are linked to deleted items/biblios?).
Good point. There is room for further improvement indeed. But no reason to switch good to less. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.