http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8366 --- Comment #9 from Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #8)
Sorry for the delay, I was doing some research. Librarians seem to like the idea of going back to 'Default' instead of 'All'. But we might want to ask why it was changed to all originally - who was confused by 'All'?
Nicole
The main issue here is that the "all" (same word) has different meanings. See the initial description of this bug: * for libraries and patrons, it means "value to use if there is no rule for this library/patron" * for itemtypes it means "otherwise", it's not exactly the same "default" Let me take another example: 3 libraries LA, LB, LC 3 patron categories PA, PB, PC 3 itemtypes IA, IB, IC If you define LA, PA, IA = 5 items LA, PA, IB = 5 items LA, PA, IC = 5 items *, *, * = 10 items it will mean one can issue 10 items from LB *and* 10 items from LC That's not the same behaviour as for itemtypes, where LA, PA, IA = 5 LA, PA, * = 10 means 10 IB *or* IC (= 10 IB, 9 IB+1IC, 8+2, 7+3,...) Different behaviour = different terms should be used ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.