http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7031 Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jcamins@cpbibliography.com --- Comment #13 from Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com> 2011-12-28 16:52:26 UTC --- Katrin, (In reply to comment #12)
Created attachment 6938 [details] screenshot of advanced search
I tested this and have some questions/notes:
1) I was searching for a special combination of itemtype A, location B, and collection code C. The search turned up a record where no item had this combination. There was one item with my itemtype A, while the other item had itemtype D, location B, and collection code C. Is it possible to make the search more specific here?
Not with GRS-1 indexing. DOM indexing would make it possible.
2) Why use phrase for itype, but not for ccode or loc? No results match your search with limit(s): 'mc-itype,phr:BK or mc-itype,phr:CF or mc-itype,phr:CR mc-ccode:"NFIC" mc-loc:"CART" or mc-loc:"CHILD"'.
I'm not sure, but I would think that adding a phrase index and using that would be preferable here (however, I wouldn't hold up the QA process for it if I were the one signing off). Of course, while we're using GRS-1 indexing, it probably doesn't really matter all that much anyway. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.