https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24254 --- Comment #42 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #41)
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #40)
Right.. I think this is pretty solid now.. Passing QA.
However, it does make me ask the question as to why our Koha::Item->store routine and cataloguing/additem.pl both do a >=/ge check on itemlost. I think you've discussed and proved to me that the check on itemlost is purely boolean.. false (0/undef) vs defined/not zero... but I can't help but have a nagging feeling the negatives used to be meaningful in some dim and distant past.
Maybe you mixed up with notforloan? (negative values are for "ordered")
I think at the moment only the negatives for notforloan and restricted have some visible effect. We could check how the hidelostitems system preference works now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.