https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31161 --- Comment #30 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #29)
I'll soften my stance a bit. I suppose it boils down to whether two endpoints are considered the same repository. It might also be enough to just document that one shouldn't harvest from multiple endpoints like they were the same repository.
Yeah, I think documenting could be enough. We could even have separate system preferences. On the non-Koha system with private/public endpoints, the private one is restricted by additional security and used for internal projects. The public one is just open to the public, so very different consumers. But we also set that up with those separate endpoints from the initial launch. With Koha, it'll be harder to transition for existing consumers of the OAI-PMH... That said, people looking for support for suppressed/hidden records, they'll probably be doing it intentionally and thus be able to coordinate a migration to a new public endpoint more easily... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.