https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603 --- Comment #9 from David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Magnus Enger from comment #6)
(In reply to David Cook from comment #5)
But in any case... I think there's a difference between the Koha 001 and 003... and the original 001 and 003.
Could you expand on this? I thought Koha left these alone, pretty much?
It does but it shouldn't 🤣.
However, how likely is it for source MARC data to have the 001 and 003 properly filled out?
In the case of Sweden and Norway: very. And I bet the Germans do it properly too?
I'm sure that's true, but I suppose I'm thinking about all the libraries (like all the ones I support) that don't use it. But I suppose if it's unused that doesn't really create a problem. And if the database columns were there, maybe we would more highly recommend them to use the 001 and 003... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.