http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12287 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #5)
I don't think so. That could cause future regressions if new found statuses are added. For example, there used to be a found status of 'F' for 'Finished' ( from before the existence of the old_reserves table iirc ). We never want to include any type of found hold when calculating a new hold's priority, set there is no need to list everything as a special case.
Looking at the code in C4/Reserves.pm and reserves/*, the 'found' value is often compared to 'W' or 'T'. Both values are listed explicitly. That's why I supposed it is safer to use the same way. I added a small comment in the line (in order to get return if someone grep found.*W.*T) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.