https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36727 Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff --- Comment #17 from Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz> --- (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #16)
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #15)
Seems that we create an inconsistency here? 023 is not in issn but it is in issn-all?
If I may comment on this: I wouldn't say that. The 023 field is a new field introduced only recently instead of the removed 022 $l subfield (a linking ISSN).
https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd023.html https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd022.html (infra)
So, the logic is: with issn-all search field we want to be able to find a record/all records with any ISSN related to that content, e.g. we want to be able to find the online and paper version of a serial with one search.
Whereas issn search field should remain for the precise search: I want to get exactly that record with exactly this ISSN in 022 $a.
With this logic I do not see a possibility nor need to put any 023 subfield in issn search field.
This makes sense to us! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.